Course Summary Course Objectives Learning Outcomes Course Materials Teaching Methods Weekly Topics Course Schedule Office Hours Assestment ECTS Calculation Course Policies Learning Tips Print Syllabi Download as PNG

ARCH302 Urban Design and Planning

Syllabus   |  International University of Sarajevo  -  Last Update on Feb 02, 2026

Referencing Curricula

Syllabus Quick Jump

Search and navigate to any syllabus instantly

HOSTED BY

Architecture

Fall 2025 - 2026 | 6 ECTS Credits | International University of Sarajevo

Academic Year
2025 - 2026
Semester
Fall
Course Code
ARCH302
Weekly Hours
1 Teaching + 2 Practice
ECTS
6
Prerequisites
ARCH201-8
Teaching Mode Delivery
Face-to-face
Prerequisite For
-
Teaching Mode Delivery Notes
-
Cycle
I Cycle
Prof. Jane Doe

Adi Ćorović

Course Lecturer

Position
Associate Professor Dr.
Email
acorovic@ius.edu.ba
Phone
033 957 -
Assistant(s)
Dženana Šenderović
Assistant E-mail
240302313@student.ius.edu.ba

Course Objectives

This course is meant to provide knowledge of basic urban concepts and at the same time to provide a critical investigation of the various urban design paradigms and approaches that respond to the challenges of contemporary urbanism. It introduces the methods with which urban design has guided public interventions in the built environment, and on that basis students are expected to be able to functionally and creatively improve the physical characteristics of the urban space and built environment.

Learning Outcomes

After successful completion of the course, the student will be able to:

1
Analyze key concepts of urban design and critically examine their application in recent professional practice
2
Communicate these concepts to design participants in non-technical language
3
Restructure and applying these concepts as analytical and prescriptive techniques
4
Critically apply these techniques and evaluating the design proposals on which they were based
5
Analyze case studies of urban design projects and their socio-spatial impacts on communities.
6
Strengthen efforts to protect and safeguard the world’s cultural and natural heritage, SDG 11.4

Course Materials

Required Textbook

V. Milinovic. Urban Design I, 1st, 2nd part. Basis and technic of urbanism / Spatial structure and Elements of urbanistic shaping of cities. Sarajevo, 1997/98 tr Engl; Daniel Pinson. Urban Planning : An ‘Undisciplined’ Discipline ?. Futures, Elsevier, 2004.; Origins and Development of Urbanism: Archaeological Perspectives Author(s): George L. Cowgill, Source: Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 33 (2004), Annual reviews; Karsten Ley. The Urban Matrix. Towards a Theory on the Parameters of Urban form and their Interrelation. Aachen, 2009.; llewelyn – Davies. Urban design compendium. The housing corporation, 2000; Urban Street Design Guide. New York: National Association of City Transportation Officials, October 2012; Urban design: Street and square. Third Edition Cliff Moughtin, 2003; - Donald Watson, Alan Plattus, Rober Shibley. TIME-SAVER STANDARDS for URBAN DESIGN, 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.: P Zucker – The Square in space and time; Law related to the Urbanistic planning of Canton Sarajevo,2017, Official gazette n 24; Srecko Pegan. Approach to urbanistic planning. University of Zagreb, 1996 - tr Engl; Emam Hossain. Models of Urban Structure, (99+) Models of Urban Structure | Emam Hossain - Academia.edu, 15 Sept2024; The epistemology of urban morphology. Brenda Case Scheer, College of Architecture and Planning, School of Architecture, University of Utah, US, 2015; Urban Renewal: KL Eco city; From urban renewal to urban regeneration: Classification criteria for urban interventions. Turin 1995–2015: evolution of planning tools and approaches; Kevin Lynch. The Image of the City. Massachusetts Institute for Technology, MIT press, 1959; Frederick Steiner Kent Butler. Planning and Urban design standards.Austin: University of Texas at Austin. American planning association, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2007; Eric Paul Mumford. “The CIAM Discourse on Urbanism 1928 1960”. 2002; Brian Chapman. Baron Haussmann and the Planning of Paris. The town planning review. Vol. 24, No. 3 (1953), Liverpool University Press + additional articles; Wienna: Gertrud Haidvogl, Verena Winiwarter, Gert Dressel, Sylvia Gierlinger, Friedrich Hauer, Severin Hohensinner, Gudrun Pollack, Christina Spitzbart-Glasl, and Erich Raith. Urban Waters and the Development of Vienna between 1683 and 1910 + add articles; Hadas Shadar. The linear city: linearity without a city. The Journal of Architecture, 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2016.1192427 Tijana Tufek-Memisevic, Ewa Stachura. A linear city development under contemporary determinants, January 2015

Additional Literature
The epistemology of urban morphology. Brenda Case Scheer, College of Architecture and Planning, School of Architecture, University of Utah, US, 2015; Urban Renewal: KL Eco city; From urban renewal to urban regeneration: Classification criteria for urban interventions. Turin 1995–2015: evolution of planning tools and approaches; Kevin Lynch. The Image of the City. Massachusetts Institute for Technology, MIT press, 1959; Austin: University of Texas at Austin. American planning association, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2007; Law related to the Urbanistic planning of Canton Sarajevo; Eric Paul Mumford. “The CIAM Discourse on Urbanism 1928 1960”. 2002; Brian Chapman. Baron Haussmann and the Planning of Paris. The town planning review. Vol. 24, No. 3 (1953), Liverpool University Press; Wienna: Gertrud Haidvogl, Verena Winiwarter, Gert Dressel, Sylvia Gierlinger, Friedrich Hauer, Severin Hohensinner, Gudrun Pollack, Christina Spitzbart-Glasl, and Erich Raith. Urban Waters and the Development of Vienna between 1683 and 1910. Note: Additional resources will be provided in class

Teaching Methods

1
Class lectures using instructor’s presentations 2
Class Exercise - Team-based 3
Urban design project

Weekly Topics

This weekly planning is subject to change with advance notice.
Week Topic Readings / References
1 Introduction to the course. Explanation of tasks and expectations
2 Introduction in urbanism Milinovic; D. Pirson, 2004; G. L. Cowgil 2004; K. Ley 2009; llewelyn – Davies 2000.
3 Elements of Urbanistic shaping of the Cities - Streets Milinovic; Urban Street Design Guide 2012;Urban design: Street and square, 2003.
4 Elements of Urbanistic shaping of the Cities - Blocks Milinovic; Time-Saver Standards, 2003.
5 Elements of Urbanistic shaping of the Cities - Squares Milinovic: llewelyn – Davies 2000.
6 Urban green, Macrourban ensembles, Submission of the Exercise 1 (10/100) Milinovic; llewelyn – Davies 2000.
7 Spatial morphological structure of the City Milinovic; Urban Form, A. J. F. Chiaradia, Univ. Hong Kong, 2019; Brenda Case Scheer, 2015.
8 Midterm (20/100)
9 Contemporary tendencies in planning and arranging space; Urban renewal, Urban reconstruction.Little urbanism Milinovic, K. Ley 2009;Urban Renewal: KL Eco city;
10 Image of the City and characteristic elements Milinovic, K. Lynch, 1959.
11 .Approach to the design of Urbanistic plans + Site visit to the Urb. Planning institute S. Pegan, 1996.
12 Types of Urban Design Plans and Urban Land use models Milinovic; Planning and Urban design standards, 2007; Emam Hossain. Models of Urban Structure
13 Typologies of divisions of cities; History of planned development of cities 1 - From Ancient world to Baroque and some general considerations related to the term of City Milinovic, E. P. Mumford, 2002.
14 History of planned development of cities 2 - Case studies Urban reconstructions Paris, Wienna Milinovic,B. Chapman, 1953;
15 Development urbanistic theories. End XIX, begining XX centery. Emerging theories Final project (40%) Important: In order to obtain a successful (passing) grade, it is necessary to take the Final exam, regardless of the grades from the In-term period. Milinovic, D. Watson - Time-Saver Standards for Urban Design, 2003

Course Schedule (All Sections)

SectionTypeDay 1Venue 1Day 2Venue 2
ARCH302.1 Course Friday 09:00 - 11:50 A F3.8 - Big Architecture Studio - -

Office Hours & Room

DayTimeOfficeNotes
Monday 13:00 - 14:00 A F3.18 ARCH307
Tuesday 14:00 - 16:00 A F3.18 ARCH405, ARCH510

Assessment Methods and Criteria

Assessment Components

25%x1
Final Exam
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1  3

10%x1
Class Exercise - Group
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1   2

20%x1
Mid-term Exam
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1

40%x1
Final project
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1  2  3  4  5

5%x1
Activity
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  2  5

IUS Grading System

Grading Scale IUS Grading System IUS Coeff. Letter (B&H) Numerical (B&H)
0 - 44 F 0 F 5
45 - 54 E 1
55 - 64 C 2 E 6
65 - 69 C+ 2.3 D 7
70 -74 B- 2.7
75 - 79 B 3 C 8
80 - 84 B+ 3.3
85 - 94 A- 3.7 B 9
95 - 100 A 4 A 10

IUS Grading System

Letter marks that do not affect student's CGPA:
  • "IP" – In progress is assigned for recording unfulfilled student obligations related to graduation project/thesis/dissertation and internship.
  • "S" – Satisfactory is assigned to a student who passed the examinations that are not numerically graded or whose written assignment has been accepted.
  • "U" – Unsatisfactory is assigned to a student who failed to pass the examinations that are not numerically graded.
  • "W" – Withdrawal signifies that student has withdrawn from the relevant course.
Additional letter mark that affects student's CGPA:

"N/A" – Not attending, and it is assigned to a student who is suspended from the course or who does not meet the minimal requirement for attendance on lectures or tutorials. The course lecturer must follow the attendance policy and assign "N/A" in each case of a student failing attendance.

Late Work Policy

Information about late submission policies will be shared during class and posted in this section. Please check back for official guidelines.

ECTS Credit Calculation

📚 Student Workload

This 6 ECTS credit course corresponds to 150 hours of total student workload, distributed as follows:

Lecture Hours

14 hours ⏳ (14 week × 1 h)

Exercise

10 hours ⏳ (5 week × 2 h)

Home Study

42 hours ⏳ (14 week × 3 h)

Mid-term Exam Preparation

24 hours ⏳ (8 week × 3 h)

Final Proj preparation

40 hours ⏳ (8 week × 5 h)

Final Exam preparation

20 hours ⏳ (4 week × 5 h)

150 Total Workload Hours

6 ECTS Credits


Course Policies

Academic Integrity

All work submitted must be your own. Plagiarism, cheating, or any form of academic dishonesty will result in disciplinary action according to university policies. When in doubt about citation practices, consult the instructor.

Attendance Policy

Students are expected to adhere to the attendance requirements as outlined in the International University of Sarajevo Study Rules and Regulations. Excessive absences, whether excused or unexcused, may impact academic performance and eligibility for assessment. Mandatory sessions (e.g., labs, workshops) require attendance unless formally exempted. For detailed policies on absences, documentation, and penalties, please refer to the official university regulations.

Technology & AI Policy

Laptops/tablets may be used for note-taking only during lectures. Phones should be silenced and put away during all class sessions. Audio/video recording requires prior permission from the instructor.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Usage: The use of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini) varies by assessment component. Please refer to the AI usage indicator next to each assessment item in the Assessment Methods and Criteria section above. Submitting AI-generated content as your own work, where AI is not explicitly allowed, constitutes an academic integrity violation.

Communication Policy

All course-related communication should occur through official university channels (institutional email or SIS). Emails should include [ARCH302] in the subject line.

Academic Quality Assurance Policy

Course Academic Quality Assurance is achieved through Semester Student Survey. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.

More info

Article 112: Evaluation of Work of the Academic Staff

  1. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.
  2. Evaluation of work of each academic staff member is to be carried out in accordance with the Statute of the institution of higher education by the institution as well as by students.
  3. The institutions of higher education are obliged to carry out a students’ evaluation survey on the academic staff performance after the end of each semester, or after the completed teaching cycle for the subject taught.
  4. Evaluation must evaluate: lecture quality, student-academic staff interaction, correctness of communication, teacher’s attitudes towards students attending the teaching activities and at assessments, availability of suggested reading material, attendance and punctuality of the teacher, along with other criteria which are defined in the Statute.
  5. The institution of higher education by a specific act determines the procedure for evaluation of the academic staff performance, the content of survey forms, the manner of conducting the evaluation, grading criteria for the evaluation, as well as adequate measures for the academic staff who received negative evaluation for two consecutive years.
  6. The evaluation of the academic staff performance is an integral process of establishment the quality assurance system, or self-control and internal quality assurance.
  7. Results of the evaluation of the academic staff performance are to be adequately analyzed by the institution of higher education, and the decision of the head of the organizational unit about the employee’s work performance is an integral part of the personal file of each member of academic staff.

Learning Tips

Engage Actively

Be prepared to contribute thoughtfully during class discussions, labs, or collaborative work. Active participation deepens understanding and encourages critical thinking.

Read and Review Purposefully

Complete assigned readings or prep materials before class. Take notes, highlight key ideas, and jot down questions. Aim to grasp core concepts and their applications—not just facts.

Think Critically in Assignments

Use course frameworks or methodologies to analyze problems, case studies, or projects. Begin early to allow time for reflection and refinement. Seek feedback to improve your work.

Ask Questions Early

Don’t hesitate to reach out when something is unclear. Use office hours, discussion boards, or peer networks to clarify concepts and stay on track.

Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey

Syllabus Last Updated on Feb 02, 2026 | International University of Sarajevo

Print Syllabus  

 

 

Referencing Curricula Print this page

Course Code Course Title Weekly Hours* ECTS Weekly Class Schedule
T P
ARCH302 Urban Design and Planning 1 2 6 Friday, 9:00-11:50
Prerequisite ARCH201-8 It is a prerequisite to -
Lecturer Adi Ćorović Office Hours / Room / Phone
Monday:
13:00-14:00 ARCH307
Tuesday:
14:00-16:00 ARCH405, ARCH510
A F3.18
E-mail acorovic@ius.edu.ba
Assistant Dženana Šenderović Assistant E-mail 240302313@student.ius.edu.ba
Course Objectives This course is meant to provide knowledge of basic urban concepts and at the same time to provide a critical investigation of the various urban design paradigms and approaches that respond to the challenges of contemporary urbanism. It introduces the methods with which urban design has guided public interventions in the built environment, and on that basis students are expected to be able to functionally and creatively improve the physical characteristics of the urban space and built environment.
Textbook V. Milinovic. Urban Design I, 1st, 2nd part. Basis and technic of urbanism / Spatial structure and Elements of urbanistic shaping of cities. Sarajevo, 1997/98 tr Engl; Daniel Pinson. Urban Planning : An ‘Undisciplined’ Discipline ?. Futures, Elsevier, 2004.; Origins and Development of Urbanism: Archaeological Perspectives Author(s): George L. Cowgill, Source: Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 33 (2004), Annual reviews; Karsten Ley. The Urban Matrix. Towards a Theory on the Parameters of Urban form and their Interrelation. Aachen, 2009.; llewelyn – Davies. Urban design compendium. The housing corporation, 2000; Urban Street Design Guide. New York: National Association of City Transportation Officials, October 2012; Urban design: Street and square. Third Edition Cliff Moughtin, 2003; - Donald Watson, Alan Plattus, Rober Shibley. TIME-SAVER STANDARDS for URBAN DESIGN, 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.: P Zucker – The Square in space and time; Law related to the Urbanistic planning of Canton Sarajevo,2017, Official gazette n 24; Srecko Pegan. Approach to urbanistic planning. University of Zagreb, 1996 - tr Engl; Emam Hossain. Models of Urban Structure, (99+) Models of Urban Structure | Emam Hossain - Academia.edu, 15 Sept2024; The epistemology of urban morphology. Brenda Case Scheer, College of Architecture and Planning, School of Architecture, University of Utah, US, 2015; Urban Renewal: KL Eco city; From urban renewal to urban regeneration: Classification criteria for urban interventions. Turin 1995–2015: evolution of planning tools and approaches; Kevin Lynch. The Image of the City. Massachusetts Institute for Technology, MIT press, 1959; Frederick Steiner Kent Butler. Planning and Urban design standards.Austin: University of Texas at Austin. American planning association, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2007; Eric Paul Mumford. “The CIAM Discourse on Urbanism 1928 1960”. 2002; Brian Chapman. Baron Haussmann and the Planning of Paris. The town planning review. Vol. 24, No. 3 (1953), Liverpool University Press + additional articles; Wienna: Gertrud Haidvogl, Verena Winiwarter, Gert Dressel, Sylvia Gierlinger, Friedrich Hauer, Severin Hohensinner, Gudrun Pollack, Christina Spitzbart-Glasl, and Erich Raith. Urban Waters and the Development of Vienna between 1683 and 1910 + add articles; Hadas Shadar. The linear city: linearity without a city. The Journal of Architecture, 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2016.1192427 Tijana Tufek-Memisevic, Ewa Stachura. A linear city development under contemporary determinants, January 2015
Additional Literature
  • The epistemology of urban morphology. Brenda Case Scheer, College of Architecture and Planning, School of Architecture, University of Utah, US, 2015; Urban Renewal: KL Eco city; From urban renewal to urban regeneration: Classification criteria for urban interventions. Turin 1995–2015: evolution of planning tools and approaches; Kevin Lynch. The Image of the City. Massachusetts Institute for Technology, MIT press, 1959;
  • Austin: University of Texas at Austin. American planning association, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2007; Law related to the Urbanistic planning of Canton Sarajevo; Eric Paul Mumford. “The CIAM Discourse on Urbanism 1928 1960”. 2002; Brian Chapman. Baron Haussmann and the Planning of Paris. The town planning review. Vol. 24, No. 3 (1953), Liverpool University Press; Wienna: Gertrud Haidvogl, Verena Winiwarter, Gert Dressel, Sylvia Gierlinger, Friedrich Hauer, Severin Hohensinner, Gudrun Pollack, Christina Spitzbart-Glasl, and Erich Raith. Urban Waters and the Development of Vienna between 1683 and 1910. Note: Additional resources will be provided in class
Learning Outcomes After successful  completion of the course, the student will be able to:
  1. Analyze key concepts of urban design and critically examine their application in recent professional practice
  2. Communicate these concepts to design participants in non-technical language
  3. Restructure and applying these concepts as analytical and prescriptive techniques
  4. Critically apply these techniques and evaluating the design proposals on which they were based
  5. Analyze case studies of urban design projects and their socio-spatial impacts on communities.
  6. Strengthen efforts to protect and safeguard the world’s cultural and natural heritage, SDG 11.4
Teaching Methods 1. Class lectures using instructor’s presentations 2. Class Exercise - Team-based 3. Urban design project
Teaching Method Delivery Face-to-face Teaching Method Delivery Notes
WEEK TOPIC REFERENCE
Week 1 Introduction to the course. Explanation of tasks and expectations
Week 2 Introduction in urbanism Milinovic; D. Pirson, 2004; G. L. Cowgil 2004; K. Ley 2009; llewelyn – Davies 2000.
Week 3 Elements of Urbanistic shaping of the Cities - Streets Milinovic; Urban Street Design Guide 2012;Urban design: Street and square, 2003.
Week 4 Elements of Urbanistic shaping of the Cities - Blocks Milinovic; Time-Saver Standards, 2003.
Week 5 Elements of Urbanistic shaping of the Cities - Squares Milinovic: llewelyn – Davies 2000.
Week 6 Urban green, Macrourban ensembles, Submission of the Exercise 1 (10/100) Milinovic; llewelyn – Davies 2000.
Week 7 Spatial morphological structure of the City Milinovic; Urban Form, A. J. F. Chiaradia, Univ. Hong Kong, 2019; Brenda Case Scheer, 2015.
Week 8 Midterm (20/100)
Week 9 Contemporary tendencies in planning and arranging space; Urban renewal, Urban reconstruction.Little urbanism Milinovic, K. Ley 2009;Urban Renewal: KL Eco city;
Week 10 Image of the City and characteristic elements Milinovic, K. Lynch, 1959.
Week 11 .Approach to the design of Urbanistic plans + Site visit to the Urb. Planning institute S. Pegan, 1996.
Week 12 Types of Urban Design Plans and Urban Land use models Milinovic; Planning and Urban design standards, 2007; Emam Hossain. Models of Urban Structure
Week 13 Typologies of divisions of cities; History of planned development of cities 1 - From Ancient world to Baroque and some general considerations related to the term of City Milinovic, E. P. Mumford, 2002.
Week 14 History of planned development of cities 2 - Case studies Urban reconstructions Paris, Wienna Milinovic,B. Chapman, 1953;
Week 15 Development urbanistic theories. End XIX, begining XX centery. Emerging theories Final project (40%) Important: In order to obtain a successful (passing) grade, it is necessary to take the Final exam, regardless of the grades from the In-term period. Milinovic, D. Watson - Time-Saver Standards for Urban Design, 2003
Assessment Methods and Criteria Evaluation Tool Quantity Weight Alignment with LOs AI Usage
Final Exam 1 25 1,3 Not Allowed
Semester Evaluation Components
Class Exercise - Group 1 10 1, 2 Not Allowed
Mid-term Exam 1 20 1 Not Allowed
Final project 1 40 1,2,3,4,5 Not Allowed
Activity 1 5 2,5 Not Allowed
***     ECTS Credit Calculation     ***
 Activity Hours Weeks Student Workload Hours Activity Hours Weeks Student Workload Hours
Lecture Hours 1 14 14 Exercise 2 5 10
Home Study 3 14 42 Mid-term Exam Preparation 3 8 24
Final Proj preparation 5 8 40 Final Exam preparation 5 4 20
0
        Total Workload Hours = 150
*T= Teaching, P= Practice ECTS Credit = 6
Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey Last Update Date: 09/02/2026

Print this page