Course Summary Course Objectives Learning Outcomes Course Materials Teaching Methods Weekly Topics Course Schedule Office Hours Assestment ECTS Calculation Course Policies Learning Tips Print Syllabi Download as PNG

ARCH401-6 Architectural Heritage Conservation

Syllabus   |  International University of Sarajevo  -  Last Update on Oct 10, 2025

Referencing Curricula

Syllabus Quick Jump

Search and navigate to any syllabus instantly

HOSTED BY

Architecture

- - | 6 ECTS Credits | International University of Sarajevo

Academic Year
-
Semester
-
Course Code
ARCH401-6
Weekly Hours
1 Teaching + 2 Practice
ECTS
6
Prerequisites
ARCH209-6
Teaching Mode Delivery
Face-to-face
Prerequisite For
-
Teaching Mode Delivery Notes
-
Cycle
I Cycle
Prof. Jane Doe

Nerma Omićević

Course Lecturer

Position
Assistant Professor Dr.
Email
nomicevic@ius.edu.ba
Phone
033 957
Assistant(s)
TBA
Assistant E-mail
-

Course Objectives

To expose students to the multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary nature of sustainable integrated conservation as well as to stimulate and encourage intellectual inquiry and research of cultural heritage, based on critical approach, so as to ensure students develop basic knowledge on heritage protection required to function as responsible architects and urban planners in the historic environments.

Learning Outcomes

After successful completion of the course, the student will be able to:

1
Demonstrate an understanding of the history of the development the idea of conservation
2
Recognize and understand the range of threats to the heritage, both human and natural, as well as the various mitigating strategies currently applied or advocated
3
Explain the basis for the concepts, principles and ethics of conservation
4
Obtain information from objects by means of investigation.
5
Conduct preliminary technical assessment of a site

Course Materials

Required Textbook

Jokilehto, J. (1999). A history of architectural conservation. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Additional Literature
Carbonara, G. (1997). Avvicinamento al restauro [Approach to restoration]. Naples: Liguori Editore. Sanković Simčić, V. (2000). Revitalizacija graditeljske baštine [Revitalisation of the architectural heritage]. Sarajevo: NNP Naša riječ d.o.o. Orbaşlı, A. (2008). Architectural conservation: Principles and practice. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd. De Angelis D’Ossat, G. (1972). Guide to the methodical study of monuments and causes of their deterioration. Rome: ICCROM, Faculty of Architecture, University of Rome. Mastropiero, M. (1996). Restoration and beyond: Architecture from conservation to conversion. Projects and works by Andrea Bruno (1960–1995). Milan: Libra Immagine. Commission to Preserve National Monuments of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2018). Principles and guidelines for the preservation of national monuments. Sarajevo: Commission to Preserve National Monuments of BH. UNESCO. (2019). Operational guidelines for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention (WHC.19/01, 10 July 2019). Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments. (1931). The Athens Charter for the Restoration of Historic Monuments. Adopted at the First International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments, Athens. ICOMOS. (1964). The Venice Charter: International charter for the conservation and restoration of monuments and sites. Adopted by the Second International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments, Venice. Congress on the European Architectural Heritage. (1975). The Declaration of Amsterdam. Adopted at the Congress on the European Architectural Heritage, Amsterdam. ICOMOS. (1994). The Nara Document on Authenticity. Adopted at the Nara Conference on Authenticity in Relation to the World Heritage Convention, Nara, Japan.

Teaching Methods

Face-to-face lectures
Tutorials
Project-based learning

Weekly Topics

This weekly planning is subject to change with advance notice.
Week Topic Readings / References
1 Introduction to the course. Syllabus overview
2 Values and Cultural Heritage – Classification
3 Question of general methodology and relation with international charters - conservation process
4 Survey of Historic Buildings
5 Survey Guide for Historic Buildings - Observation
6 Survey Guide for Historic Buildings - Observation
7 Conservation, Restoration and question of methods
8 Midterm exam
9 Restorators anticipations before the XIX and beginning of the XIX century
10 Restoration „In Style“& „Revival“
11 Restoration, Anti-restoration and Romanticism
12 Philological restorations from the end of XIX century; Historical restoration and Positivism
13 Scientific restoration of the first half of XX century
14 Actual approach - Critical restoration
15 Case studies: Restoration of Red cross building in Sarajevo and Bagraty Cathedral in Georgia

Course Schedule (All Sections)

Course Schedules with all sections will be available here soon.

Office Hours & Room

Course Office hours will be available here soon.

Assessment Methods and Criteria

Assessment Components

40%x1
Final Exam
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1  2  3  5

20%x1
Midterm exam
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1  3

30%x1
Project
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1  2  3  4  5

10%x1
Activity/Progress
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1  2  3  4  5

IUS Grading System

Grading Scale IUS Grading System IUS Coeff. Letter (B&H) Numerical (B&H)
0 - 44 F 0 F 5
45 - 54 E 1
55 - 64 C 2 E 6
65 - 69 C+ 2.3 D 7
70 -74 B- 2.7
75 - 79 B 3 C 8
80 - 84 B+ 3.3
85 - 94 A- 3.7 B 9
95 - 100 A 4 A 10

IUS Grading System

Letter marks that do not affect student's CGPA:
  • "IP" – In progress is assigned for recording unfulfilled student obligations related to graduation project/thesis/dissertation and internship.
  • "S" – Satisfactory is assigned to a student who passed the examinations that are not numerically graded or whose written assignment has been accepted.
  • "U" – Unsatisfactory is assigned to a student who failed to pass the examinations that are not numerically graded.
  • "W" – Withdrawal signifies that student has withdrawn from the relevant course.
Additional letter mark that affects student's CGPA:

"N/A" – Not attending, and it is assigned to a student who is suspended from the course or who does not meet the minimal requirement for attendance on lectures or tutorials. The course lecturer must follow the attendance policy and assign "N/A" in each case of a student failing attendance.

Late Work Policy

Information about late submission policies will be shared during class and posted in this section. Please check back for official guidelines.

ECTS Credit Calculation

📚 Student Workload

This 6 ECTS credit course corresponds to 150 hours of total student workload, distributed as follows:

Final exam

3 hours ⏳ (1 week × 3 h)

Midterm exam

3 hours ⏳ (1 week × 3 h)

Lectures

14 hours ⏳ (14 week × 1 h)

Tutorials

28 hours ⏳ (14 week × 2 h)

Home study

98 hours ⏳ (14 week × 7 h)

Final exam study

4 hours ⏳ (1 week × 4 h)

150 Total Workload Hours

6 ECTS Credits


Course Policies

Academic Integrity

All work submitted must be your own. Plagiarism, cheating, or any form of academic dishonesty will result in disciplinary action according to university policies. When in doubt about citation practices, consult the instructor.

Attendance Policy

Students are expected to adhere to the attendance requirements as outlined in the International University of Sarajevo Study Rules and Regulations. Excessive absences, whether excused or unexcused, may impact academic performance and eligibility for assessment. Mandatory sessions (e.g., labs, workshops) require attendance unless formally exempted. For detailed policies on absences, documentation, and penalties, please refer to the official university regulations.

Technology & AI Policy

Laptops/tablets may be used for note-taking only during lectures. Phones should be silenced and put away during all class sessions. Audio/video recording requires prior permission from the instructor.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Usage: The use of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini) varies by assessment component. Please refer to the AI usage indicator next to each assessment item in the Assessment Methods and Criteria section above. Submitting AI-generated content as your own work, where AI is not explicitly allowed, constitutes an academic integrity violation.

Communication Policy

All course-related communication should occur through official university channels (institutional email or SIS). Emails should include [ARCH401-6] in the subject line.

Academic Quality Assurance Policy

Course Academic Quality Assurance is achieved through Semester Student Survey. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.

More info

Article 112: Evaluation of Work of the Academic Staff

  1. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.
  2. Evaluation of work of each academic staff member is to be carried out in accordance with the Statute of the institution of higher education by the institution as well as by students.
  3. The institutions of higher education are obliged to carry out a students’ evaluation survey on the academic staff performance after the end of each semester, or after the completed teaching cycle for the subject taught.
  4. Evaluation must evaluate: lecture quality, student-academic staff interaction, correctness of communication, teacher’s attitudes towards students attending the teaching activities and at assessments, availability of suggested reading material, attendance and punctuality of the teacher, along with other criteria which are defined in the Statute.
  5. The institution of higher education by a specific act determines the procedure for evaluation of the academic staff performance, the content of survey forms, the manner of conducting the evaluation, grading criteria for the evaluation, as well as adequate measures for the academic staff who received negative evaluation for two consecutive years.
  6. The evaluation of the academic staff performance is an integral process of establishment the quality assurance system, or self-control and internal quality assurance.
  7. Results of the evaluation of the academic staff performance are to be adequately analyzed by the institution of higher education, and the decision of the head of the organizational unit about the employee’s work performance is an integral part of the personal file of each member of academic staff.

Learning Tips

Engage Actively

Be prepared to contribute thoughtfully during class discussions, labs, or collaborative work. Active participation deepens understanding and encourages critical thinking.

Read and Review Purposefully

Complete assigned readings or prep materials before class. Take notes, highlight key ideas, and jot down questions. Aim to grasp core concepts and their applications—not just facts.

Think Critically in Assignments

Use course frameworks or methodologies to analyze problems, case studies, or projects. Begin early to allow time for reflection and refinement. Seek feedback to improve your work.

Ask Questions Early

Don’t hesitate to reach out when something is unclear. Use office hours, discussion boards, or peer networks to clarify concepts and stay on track.

Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey

Syllabus Last Updated on Oct 10, 2025 | International University of Sarajevo

Print Syllabus  

 

 

Referencing Curricula Print this page

Course Code Course Title Weekly Hours* ECTS Weekly Class Schedule
T P
ARCH401-6 Architectural Heritage Conservation 1 2 6 TBA
Prerequisite ARCH209-6 It is a prerequisite to -
Lecturer Nerma Omićević Office Hours / Room / Phone
Wednesday:
9:30-12:00
Thursday:
9:30-12:00
A F3.18 - 033 957 213
E-mail nomicevic@ius.edu.ba
Assistant TBA Assistant E-mail
Course Objectives To expose students to the multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary nature of sustainable integrated conservation as well as to stimulate and encourage intellectual inquiry and research of cultural heritage, based on critical approach, so as to ensure students develop basic knowledge on heritage protection required to function as responsible architects and urban planners in the historic environments.
Textbook Jokilehto, J. (1999). A history of architectural conservation. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Additional Literature
  • Carbonara, G. (1997). Avvicinamento al restauro [Approach to restoration]. Naples: Liguori Editore.
  • Sanković Simčić, V. (2000). Revitalizacija graditeljske baštine [Revitalisation of the architectural heritage]. Sarajevo: NNP Naša riječ d.o.o.
  • Orbaşlı, A. (2008). Architectural conservation: Principles and practice. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.
  • De Angelis D’Ossat, G. (1972). Guide to the methodical study of monuments and causes of their deterioration. Rome: ICCROM, Faculty of Architecture, University of Rome.
  • Mastropiero, M. (1996). Restoration and beyond: Architecture from conservation to conversion. Projects and works by Andrea Bruno (1960–1995). Milan: Libra Immagine.
  • Commission to Preserve National Monuments of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2018). Principles and guidelines for the preservation of national monuments. Sarajevo: Commission to Preserve National Monuments of BH.
  • UNESCO. (2019). Operational guidelines for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention (WHC.19/01, 10 July 2019). Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
  • International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments. (1931). The Athens Charter for the Restoration of Historic Monuments. Adopted at the First International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments, Athens.
  • ICOMOS. (1964). The Venice Charter: International charter for the conservation and restoration of monuments and sites. Adopted by the Second International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments, Venice.
  • Congress on the European Architectural Heritage. (1975). The Declaration of Amsterdam. Adopted at the Congress on the European Architectural Heritage, Amsterdam.
  • ICOMOS. (1994). The Nara Document on Authenticity. Adopted at the Nara Conference on Authenticity in Relation to the World Heritage Convention, Nara, Japan.
Learning Outcomes After successful  completion of the course, the student will be able to:
  1. Demonstrate an understanding of the history of the development the idea of conservation
  2. Recognize and understand the range of threats to the heritage, both human and natural, as well as the various mitigating strategies currently applied or advocated
  3. Explain the basis for the concepts, principles and ethics of conservation
  4. Obtain information from objects by means of investigation.
  5. Conduct preliminary technical assessment of a site
Teaching Methods Face-to-face lectures, tutorials, project-based learning
Teaching Method Delivery Face-to-face Teaching Method Delivery Notes
WEEK TOPIC REFERENCE
Week 1 Introduction to the course. Syllabus overview
Week 2 Values and Cultural Heritage – Classification
Week 3 Question of general methodology and relation with international charters - conservation process
Week 4 Survey of Historic Buildings
Week 5 Survey Guide for Historic Buildings - Observation
Week 6 Survey Guide for Historic Buildings - Observation
Week 7 Conservation, Restoration and question of methods
Week 8 Midterm exam
Week 9 Restorators anticipations before the XIX and beginning of the XIX century
Week 10 Restoration „In Style“& „Revival“
Week 11 Restoration, Anti-restoration and Romanticism
Week 12 Philological restorations from the end of XIX century; Historical restoration and Positivism
Week 13 Scientific restoration of the first half of XX century
Week 14 Actual approach - Critical restoration
Week 15 Case studies: Restoration of Red cross building in Sarajevo and Bagraty Cathedral in Georgia
Assessment Methods and Criteria Evaluation Tool Quantity Weight Alignment with LOs AI Usage
Final Exam 1 40 1,2,3,5 Not Allowed
Semester Evaluation Components
Midterm exam 1 20 1,3 Not Allowed
Project 1 30 1,2,3,4,5 Not Allowed
Activity/Progress 1 10 1,2,3,4,5 Not Allowed
***     ECTS Credit Calculation     ***
 Activity Hours Weeks Student Workload Hours Activity Hours Weeks Student Workload Hours
Final exam 3 1 3 Midterm exam 3 1 3
Lectures 1 14 14 Tutorials 2 14 28
Home study 7 14 98 Final exam study 4 1 4
        Total Workload Hours = 150
*T= Teaching, P= Practice ECTS Credit = 6
Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey Last Update Date: 27/10/2025

Print this page