Syllabus | International University of Sarajevo - Last Update on Oct 10, 2025
Course Lecturer
This course introduces students to: • the knowledge of the processes of design; • the critical thinking about results of architectural design; • acquire a methodology to study designers; and • report on their observations in an assignment.
After successful completion of the course, the student will be able to:
Neufert, Ernst, Neufert, Peter, "Neufert Architects' Data", Wiley-Blackwell; 4 edition, 2012. Nesbitt, Kate, „Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: an anthology of architectural theory 1965-1995“, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 1996 Clark, H. and Brody, D., Design Studies: A Reader, Berg Publishers, 2009. Hearn, Fil, „Ideas That Shaped Buildings“, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, 2003. Laaksonen, E., Simons, T. and Vartola, A., Research and Practice in Architecture, Rakennustieto Publishing, 2008. Project Management in Construction, Sidney M. Levi, Me Grow Hill Professional;2006;
| Week | Topic | Readings / References |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Introduction to Understanding Design Behavior. | N/A |
| 2 | Presentation of assessment requirements with all basic information for designing of those types of buildings. Site analysis and understanding of surroundings, context, climate, sun orientation, circulation accessibility. | Neufert, Ernst, Neufert, Peter, "Neufert Architects' Data", Wiley-Blackwell; 4 edition, 2012 |
| 3 | Methodology, processes and thinking in architectural design. | Clark, H. and Brody, D., Design Studies: A Reader, Berg Publishers, 2009. |
| 4 | Students presentations. | N/A |
| 5 | Contemporary trends in design behavior. | Nesbitt, Kate, „Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: an anthology of architectural theory 1965-1995“, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 1996 |
| 6 | Contemporary trends in design behavior. | Nesbitt, Kate, „Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: an anthology of architectural theory 1965-1995“, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 1996 |
| 7 | Midterm project submission and presentation. | N/A |
| 8 | Day critiques, discussion about design development. | N/A |
| 9 | Architectural theory and criticism. | Hearn, Fil, „Ideas That Shaped Buildings“, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, 2003. Project Management in Construction, Sidney M. Levi, Me Grow Hill Professional;2006; |
| 10 | Architectural theory and criticism. | Hearn, Fil, „Ideas That Shaped Buildings“, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, 2003. Project Management in Construction, Sidney M. Levi, Me Grow Hill Professional;2006; |
| 11 | Using of research in architectural practice. | Laaksonen, E., Simons, T. and Vartola, A., Research and Practice in Architecture, Rakennustieto Publishing, 2008. |
| 12 | Using of research in architectural practice. | Laaksonen, E., Simons, T. and Vartola, A., Research and Practice in Architecture, Rakennustieto Publishing, 2008. |
| 13 | Day critiques, discussion about research and design development. | N/A |
| 14 | Day critiques, discussion about research and design development. | N/A |
| 15 | Final project submission and presentation. | N/A |
| Section | Type | Day 1 | Venue 1 | Day 2 | Venue 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARCH502.1 | Course | Tuesday 17:00 - 18:50 | A F3.10 - Architecture Classroom | - | - |
| Day | Time | Office | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wednesday | 09:00 - 11:00 | A F3.13 | |
| Thursday | 12:00 - 15:00 | A F3.13 |
Alignment with Learning Outcomes : 1 2 3 4 5
Alignment with Learning Outcomes : 1 2 3 4 5
Alignment with Learning Outcomes : 1 2 3 4 5
Alignment with Learning Outcomes :
| Grading Scale | IUS Grading System | IUS Coeff. | Letter (B&H) | Numerical (B&H) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 - 44 | F | 0 | F | 5 |
| 45 - 54 | E | 1 | ||
| 55 - 64 | C | 2 | E | 6 |
| 65 - 69 | C+ | 2.3 | D | 7 |
| 70 -74 | B- | 2.7 | ||
| 75 - 79 | B | 3 | C | 8 |
| 80 - 84 | B+ | 3.3 | ||
| 85 - 94 | A- | 3.7 | B | 9 |
| 95 - 100 | A | 4 | A | 10 |
Information about late submission policies will be shared during class and posted in this section. Please check back for official guidelines.
This 4 ECTS credit course corresponds to 100 hours of total student workload, distributed as follows:
12 hours ⏳ (6 week × 2 h)
36 hours ⏳ (9 week × 4 h)
12 hours ⏳ (6 week × 2 h)
10 hours ⏳ (2 week × 5 h)
18 hours ⏳ (3 week × 6 h)
12 hours ⏳ (2 week × 6 h)
100 Total Workload Hours
4 ECTS Credits
All work submitted must be your own. Plagiarism, cheating, or any form of academic dishonesty will result in disciplinary action according to university policies. When in doubt about citation practices, consult the instructor.
Students are expected to adhere to the attendance requirements as outlined in the International University of Sarajevo Study Rules and Regulations. Excessive absences, whether excused or unexcused, may impact academic performance and eligibility for assessment. Mandatory sessions (e.g., labs, workshops) require attendance unless formally exempted. For detailed policies on absences, documentation, and penalties, please refer to the official university regulations.
Laptops/tablets may be used for note-taking only during lectures. Phones should be silenced and put away during all class sessions. Audio/video recording requires prior permission from the instructor.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Usage: The use of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini) varies by assessment component. Please refer to the AI usage indicator next to each assessment item in the Assessment Methods and Criteria section above. Submitting AI-generated content as your own work, where AI is not explicitly allowed, constitutes an academic integrity violation.
All course-related communication should occur through official university channels (institutional email or SIS). Emails should include [ARCH502] in the subject line.
Course Academic Quality Assurance is achieved through Semester Student Survey. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.
Be prepared to contribute thoughtfully during class discussions, labs, or collaborative work. Active participation deepens understanding and encourages critical thinking.
Complete assigned readings or prep materials before class. Take notes, highlight key ideas, and jot down questions. Aim to grasp core concepts and their applications—not just facts.
Use course frameworks or methodologies to analyze problems, case studies, or projects. Begin early to allow time for reflection and refinement. Seek feedback to improve your work.
Don’t hesitate to reach out when something is unclear. Use office hours, discussion boards, or peer networks to clarify concepts and stay on track.
Syllabus Last Updated on Oct 10, 2025 | International University of Sarajevo
Print Syllabus
Referencing Curricula Print this page
| Course Code | Course Title | Weekly Hours* | ECTS | Weekly Class Schedule | ||||||
| T | P | |||||||||
| ARCH502 | Understanding Design Behavior | 2 | 0 | 4 | ||||||
| Prerequisite | None | It is a prerequisite to | - | |||||||
| Lecturer | Adnan Zoranić | Office Hours / Room / Phone | Wednesday: 9:00-11:00 Thursday: 12:00-15:00 |
|||||||
| azoranic@ius.edu.ba | ||||||||||
| Assistant | - | Assistant E-mail | azoranic@ius.edu.ba | |||||||
| Course Objectives | This course introduces students to: • the knowledge of the processes of design; • the critical thinking about results of architectural design; • acquire a methodology to study designers; and • report on their observations in an assignment. |
|||||||||
| Textbook | Neufert, Ernst, Neufert, Peter, "Neufert Architects' Data", Wiley-Blackwell; 4 edition, 2012. Nesbitt, Kate, „Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: an anthology of architectural theory 1965-1995“, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 1996 Clark, H. and Brody, D., Design Studies: A Reader, Berg Publishers, 2009. Hearn, Fil, „Ideas That Shaped Buildings“, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, 2003. Laaksonen, E., Simons, T. and Vartola, A., Research and Practice in Architecture, Rakennustieto Publishing, 2008. Project Management in Construction, Sidney M. Levi, Me Grow Hill Professional;2006; | |||||||||
| Additional Literature |
|
|||||||||
| Learning Outcomes | After successful completion of the course, the student will be able to: | |||||||||
|
||||||||||
| Teaching Methods | Lectures with examples and class discussions. Active tutorial sessions for engaged learning and continuous feedback on progress. In this course, students will have worked closely with a team on a unique architectural design and research. | |||||||||
| Teaching Method Delivery | Face-to-face | Teaching Method Delivery Notes | ||||||||
| WEEK | TOPIC | REFERENCE | ||||||||
| Week 1 | Introduction to Understanding Design Behavior. | N/A | ||||||||
| Week 2 | Presentation of assessment requirements with all basic information for designing of those types of buildings. Site analysis and understanding of surroundings, context, climate, sun orientation, circulation accessibility. | Neufert, Ernst, Neufert, Peter, "Neufert Architects' Data", Wiley-Blackwell; 4 edition, 2012 | ||||||||
| Week 3 | Methodology, processes and thinking in architectural design. | Clark, H. and Brody, D., Design Studies: A Reader, Berg Publishers, 2009. | ||||||||
| Week 4 | Students presentations. | N/A | ||||||||
| Week 5 | Contemporary trends in design behavior. | Nesbitt, Kate, „Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: an anthology of architectural theory 1965-1995“, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 1996 | ||||||||
| Week 6 | Contemporary trends in design behavior. | Nesbitt, Kate, „Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: an anthology of architectural theory 1965-1995“, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 1996 | ||||||||
| Week 7 | Midterm project submission and presentation. | N/A | ||||||||
| Week 8 | Day critiques, discussion about design development. | N/A | ||||||||
| Week 9 | Architectural theory and criticism. | Hearn, Fil, „Ideas That Shaped Buildings“, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, 2003. Project Management in Construction, Sidney M. Levi, Me Grow Hill Professional;2006; | ||||||||
| Week 10 | Architectural theory and criticism. | Hearn, Fil, „Ideas That Shaped Buildings“, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, 2003. Project Management in Construction, Sidney M. Levi, Me Grow Hill Professional;2006; | ||||||||
| Week 11 | Using of research in architectural practice. | Laaksonen, E., Simons, T. and Vartola, A., Research and Practice in Architecture, Rakennustieto Publishing, 2008. | ||||||||
| Week 12 | Using of research in architectural practice. | Laaksonen, E., Simons, T. and Vartola, A., Research and Practice in Architecture, Rakennustieto Publishing, 2008. | ||||||||
| Week 13 | Day critiques, discussion about research and design development. | N/A | ||||||||
| Week 14 | Day critiques, discussion about research and design development. | N/A | ||||||||
| Week 15 | Final project submission and presentation. | N/A | ||||||||
| Assessment Methods and Criteria | Evaluation Tool | Quantity | Weight | Alignment with LOs | AI Usage |
| Final Project | 1 | 50 | 1,2,3,4,5 | Not Allowed | |
| Semester Evaluation Components | |||||
| Presentation of site analyses | 1 | 10 | 1,2,3,4,5 | Not Allowed | |
| Midterm presentation | 1 | 25 | 1,2,3,4,5 | Not Allowed | |
| Activity/Progress | 1 | 15 | N/A | Not Allowed | |
| *** ECTS Credit Calculation *** | |||||
| Activity | Hours | Weeks | Student Workload Hours | Activity | Hours | Weeks | Student Workload Hours | |||
| Lecture hours | 2 | 6 | 12 | Home study and work | 4 | 9 | 36 | |||
| Active tutorials | 2 | 6 | 12 | In-term exams/projects | 5 | 2 | 10 | |||
| Final project | 6 | 3 | 18 | Final project presentation | 6 | 2 | 12 | |||
| Total Workload Hours = | 100 | |||||||||
| *T= Teaching, P= Practice | ECTS Credit = | 4 | ||||||||
| Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey | Last Update Date: 20/10/2025 | |||||||||