Course Summary Course Objectives Learning Outcomes Course Materials Teaching Methods Weekly Topics Course Schedule Office Hours Assestment ECTS Calculation Course Policies Learning Tips Print Syllabi Download as PNG

ARCH502 Understanding Design Behavior

Syllabus   |  International University of Sarajevo  -  Last Update on Oct 10, 2025

Referencing Curricula

Syllabus Quick Jump

Search and navigate to any syllabus instantly

HOSTED BY

Architecture

Fall 2024 - 2025 | 4 ECTS Credits | International University of Sarajevo

Academic Year
2024 - 2025
Semester
Fall
Course Code
ARCH502
Weekly Hours
2 Teaching + 0 Practice
ECTS
4
Prerequisites
None
Teaching Mode Delivery
Face-to-face
Prerequisite For
-
Teaching Mode Delivery Notes
-
Cycle
II Cycle
Prof. Jane Doe

Adnan Zoranić

Course Lecturer

Position
Associate Professor Dr.
Email
azoranic@ius.edu.ba
Phone
033 957 -
Assistant(s)
-
Assistant E-mail
azoranic@ius.edu.ba

Course Objectives

This course introduces students to: • the knowledge of the processes of design; • the critical thinking about results of architectural design; • acquire a methodology to study designers; and • report on their observations in an assignment.

Learning Outcomes

After successful completion of the course, the student will be able to:

1
Develop the knowledge of the processes of design and understanding of how designers think.
2
Acquire a methodology to study designers. This is highlighted by assignments which require students to study designers and report on their observations.
3
Achieve an understanding of the issues involved in design thinking research and gain knowledge of methods for studying design thinking.
4
Identify developement of design thinking, activity and processes during times, ideas and styles.
5
Apply basic ideas, principles, skills and techniques to their own research.

Course Materials

Required Textbook

Neufert, Ernst, Neufert, Peter, "Neufert Architects' Data", Wiley-Blackwell; 4 edition, 2012. Nesbitt, Kate, „Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: an anthology of architectural theory 1965-1995“, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 1996 Clark, H. and Brody, D., Design Studies: A Reader, Berg Publishers, 2009. Hearn, Fil, „Ideas That Shaped Buildings“, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, 2003. Laaksonen, E., Simons, T. and Vartola, A., Research and Practice in Architecture, Rakennustieto Publishing, 2008. Project Management in Construction, Sidney M. Levi, Me Grow Hill Professional;2006;

Additional Literature
-

Teaching Methods

Lectures with examples and class discussions
Active tutorial sessions for engaged learning and continuous feedback on progress
In this course, students will have worked closely with a team on a unique architectural design and research

Weekly Topics

This weekly planning is subject to change with advance notice.
Week Topic Readings / References
1 Introduction to Understanding Design Behavior. N/A
2 Presentation of assessment requirements with all basic information for designing of those types of buildings. Site analysis and understanding of surroundings, context, climate, sun orientation, circulation accessibility. Neufert, Ernst, Neufert, Peter, "Neufert Architects' Data", Wiley-Blackwell; 4 edition, 2012
3 Methodology, processes and thinking in architectural design. Clark, H. and Brody, D., Design Studies: A Reader, Berg Publishers, 2009.
4 Students presentations. N/A
5 Contemporary trends in design behavior. Nesbitt, Kate, „Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: an anthology of architectural theory 1965-1995“, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 1996
6 Contemporary trends in design behavior. Nesbitt, Kate, „Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: an anthology of architectural theory 1965-1995“, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 1996
7 Midterm project submission and presentation. N/A
8 Day critiques, discussion about design development. N/A
9 Architectural theory and criticism. Hearn, Fil, „Ideas That Shaped Buildings“, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, 2003. Project Management in Construction, Sidney M. Levi, Me Grow Hill Professional;2006;
10 Architectural theory and criticism. Hearn, Fil, „Ideas That Shaped Buildings“, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, 2003. Project Management in Construction, Sidney M. Levi, Me Grow Hill Professional;2006;
11 Using of research in architectural practice. Laaksonen, E., Simons, T. and Vartola, A., Research and Practice in Architecture, Rakennustieto Publishing, 2008.
12 Using of research in architectural practice. Laaksonen, E., Simons, T. and Vartola, A., Research and Practice in Architecture, Rakennustieto Publishing, 2008.
13 Day critiques, discussion about research and design development. N/A
14 Day critiques, discussion about research and design development. N/A
15 Final project submission and presentation. N/A

Course Schedule (All Sections)

SectionTypeDay 1Venue 1Day 2Venue 2
ARCH502.1 Course Tuesday 17:00 - 18:50 A F3.10 - Architecture Classroom - -

Office Hours & Room

DayTimeOfficeNotes
Wednesday 09:00 - 11:00 A F3.13
Thursday 12:00 - 15:00 A F3.13

Assessment Methods and Criteria

Assessment Components

50%x1
Final Project
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1  2  3  4  5

10%x1
Presentation of site analyses
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1  2  3  4  5

25%x1
Midterm presentation
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1  2  3  4  5

15%x1
Activity/Progress
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes : 

IUS Grading System

Grading Scale IUS Grading System IUS Coeff. Letter (B&H) Numerical (B&H)
0 - 44 F 0 F 5
45 - 54 E 1
55 - 64 C 2 E 6
65 - 69 C+ 2.3 D 7
70 -74 B- 2.7
75 - 79 B 3 C 8
80 - 84 B+ 3.3
85 - 94 A- 3.7 B 9
95 - 100 A 4 A 10

IUS Grading System

Letter marks that do not affect student's CGPA:
  • "IP" – In progress is assigned for recording unfulfilled student obligations related to graduation project/thesis/dissertation and internship.
  • "S" – Satisfactory is assigned to a student who passed the examinations that are not numerically graded or whose written assignment has been accepted.
  • "U" – Unsatisfactory is assigned to a student who failed to pass the examinations that are not numerically graded.
  • "W" – Withdrawal signifies that student has withdrawn from the relevant course.
Additional letter mark that affects student's CGPA:

"N/A" – Not attending, and it is assigned to a student who is suspended from the course or who does not meet the minimal requirement for attendance on lectures or tutorials. The course lecturer must follow the attendance policy and assign "N/A" in each case of a student failing attendance.

Late Work Policy

Information about late submission policies will be shared during class and posted in this section. Please check back for official guidelines.

ECTS Credit Calculation

📚 Student Workload

This 4 ECTS credit course corresponds to 100 hours of total student workload, distributed as follows:

Lecture hours

12 hours ⏳ (6 week × 2 h)

Home study and work

36 hours ⏳ (9 week × 4 h)

Active tutorials

12 hours ⏳ (6 week × 2 h)

In-term exams/projects

10 hours ⏳ (2 week × 5 h)

Final project

18 hours ⏳ (3 week × 6 h)

Final project presentation

12 hours ⏳ (2 week × 6 h)

100 Total Workload Hours

4 ECTS Credits


Course Policies

Academic Integrity

All work submitted must be your own. Plagiarism, cheating, or any form of academic dishonesty will result in disciplinary action according to university policies. When in doubt about citation practices, consult the instructor.

Attendance Policy

Students are expected to adhere to the attendance requirements as outlined in the International University of Sarajevo Study Rules and Regulations. Excessive absences, whether excused or unexcused, may impact academic performance and eligibility for assessment. Mandatory sessions (e.g., labs, workshops) require attendance unless formally exempted. For detailed policies on absences, documentation, and penalties, please refer to the official university regulations.

Technology & AI Policy

Laptops/tablets may be used for note-taking only during lectures. Phones should be silenced and put away during all class sessions. Audio/video recording requires prior permission from the instructor.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Usage: The use of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini) varies by assessment component. Please refer to the AI usage indicator next to each assessment item in the Assessment Methods and Criteria section above. Submitting AI-generated content as your own work, where AI is not explicitly allowed, constitutes an academic integrity violation.

Communication Policy

All course-related communication should occur through official university channels (institutional email or SIS). Emails should include [ARCH502] in the subject line.

Academic Quality Assurance Policy

Course Academic Quality Assurance is achieved through Semester Student Survey. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.

More info

Article 112: Evaluation of Work of the Academic Staff

  1. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.
  2. Evaluation of work of each academic staff member is to be carried out in accordance with the Statute of the institution of higher education by the institution as well as by students.
  3. The institutions of higher education are obliged to carry out a students’ evaluation survey on the academic staff performance after the end of each semester, or after the completed teaching cycle for the subject taught.
  4. Evaluation must evaluate: lecture quality, student-academic staff interaction, correctness of communication, teacher’s attitudes towards students attending the teaching activities and at assessments, availability of suggested reading material, attendance and punctuality of the teacher, along with other criteria which are defined in the Statute.
  5. The institution of higher education by a specific act determines the procedure for evaluation of the academic staff performance, the content of survey forms, the manner of conducting the evaluation, grading criteria for the evaluation, as well as adequate measures for the academic staff who received negative evaluation for two consecutive years.
  6. The evaluation of the academic staff performance is an integral process of establishment the quality assurance system, or self-control and internal quality assurance.
  7. Results of the evaluation of the academic staff performance are to be adequately analyzed by the institution of higher education, and the decision of the head of the organizational unit about the employee’s work performance is an integral part of the personal file of each member of academic staff.

Learning Tips

Engage Actively

Be prepared to contribute thoughtfully during class discussions, labs, or collaborative work. Active participation deepens understanding and encourages critical thinking.

Read and Review Purposefully

Complete assigned readings or prep materials before class. Take notes, highlight key ideas, and jot down questions. Aim to grasp core concepts and their applications—not just facts.

Think Critically in Assignments

Use course frameworks or methodologies to analyze problems, case studies, or projects. Begin early to allow time for reflection and refinement. Seek feedback to improve your work.

Ask Questions Early

Don’t hesitate to reach out when something is unclear. Use office hours, discussion boards, or peer networks to clarify concepts and stay on track.

Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey

Syllabus Last Updated on Oct 10, 2025 | International University of Sarajevo

Print Syllabus  

 

 

Referencing Curricula Print this page

Course Code Course Title Weekly Hours* ECTS Weekly Class Schedule
T P
ARCH502 Understanding Design Behavior 2 0 4
Prerequisite None It is a prerequisite to -
Lecturer Adnan Zoranić Office Hours / Room / Phone
Wednesday:
9:00-11:00
Thursday:
12:00-15:00
A F3.13
E-mail azoranic@ius.edu.ba
Assistant - Assistant E-mail azoranic@ius.edu.ba
Course Objectives This course introduces students to:
• the knowledge of the processes of design;
• the critical thinking about results of architectural design;
• acquire a methodology to study designers; and
• report on their observations in an assignment.
Textbook Neufert, Ernst, Neufert, Peter, "Neufert Architects' Data", Wiley-Blackwell; 4 edition, 2012. Nesbitt, Kate, „Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: an anthology of architectural theory 1965-1995“, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 1996 Clark, H. and Brody, D., Design Studies: A Reader, Berg Publishers, 2009. Hearn, Fil, „Ideas That Shaped Buildings“, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, 2003. Laaksonen, E., Simons, T. and Vartola, A., Research and Practice in Architecture, Rakennustieto Publishing, 2008. Project Management in Construction, Sidney M. Levi, Me Grow Hill Professional;2006;
Additional Literature
  • -
Learning Outcomes After successful  completion of the course, the student will be able to:
  1. Develop the knowledge of the processes of design and understanding of how designers think.
  2. Acquire a methodology to study designers. This is highlighted by assignments which require students to study designers and report on their observations.
  3. Achieve an understanding of the issues involved in design thinking research and gain knowledge of methods for studying design thinking.
  4. Identify developement of design thinking, activity and processes during times, ideas and styles.
  5. Apply basic ideas, principles, skills and techniques to their own research.
Teaching Methods Lectures with examples and class discussions. Active tutorial sessions for engaged learning and continuous feedback on progress. In this course, students will have worked closely with a team on a unique architectural design and research.
Teaching Method Delivery Face-to-face Teaching Method Delivery Notes
WEEK TOPIC REFERENCE
Week 1 Introduction to Understanding Design Behavior. N/A
Week 2 Presentation of assessment requirements with all basic information for designing of those types of buildings. Site analysis and understanding of surroundings, context, climate, sun orientation, circulation accessibility. Neufert, Ernst, Neufert, Peter, "Neufert Architects' Data", Wiley-Blackwell; 4 edition, 2012
Week 3 Methodology, processes and thinking in architectural design. Clark, H. and Brody, D., Design Studies: A Reader, Berg Publishers, 2009.
Week 4 Students presentations. N/A
Week 5 Contemporary trends in design behavior. Nesbitt, Kate, „Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: an anthology of architectural theory 1965-1995“, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 1996
Week 6 Contemporary trends in design behavior. Nesbitt, Kate, „Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: an anthology of architectural theory 1965-1995“, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 1996
Week 7 Midterm project submission and presentation. N/A
Week 8 Day critiques, discussion about design development. N/A
Week 9 Architectural theory and criticism. Hearn, Fil, „Ideas That Shaped Buildings“, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, 2003. Project Management in Construction, Sidney M. Levi, Me Grow Hill Professional;2006;
Week 10 Architectural theory and criticism. Hearn, Fil, „Ideas That Shaped Buildings“, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, 2003. Project Management in Construction, Sidney M. Levi, Me Grow Hill Professional;2006;
Week 11 Using of research in architectural practice. Laaksonen, E., Simons, T. and Vartola, A., Research and Practice in Architecture, Rakennustieto Publishing, 2008.
Week 12 Using of research in architectural practice. Laaksonen, E., Simons, T. and Vartola, A., Research and Practice in Architecture, Rakennustieto Publishing, 2008.
Week 13 Day critiques, discussion about research and design development. N/A
Week 14 Day critiques, discussion about research and design development. N/A
Week 15 Final project submission and presentation. N/A
Assessment Methods and Criteria Evaluation Tool Quantity Weight Alignment with LOs AI Usage
Final Project 1 50 1,2,3,4,5 Not Allowed
Semester Evaluation Components
Presentation of site analyses 1 10 1,2,3,4,5 Not Allowed
Midterm presentation 1 25 1,2,3,4,5 Not Allowed
Activity/Progress 1 15 N/A Not Allowed
***     ECTS Credit Calculation     ***
 Activity Hours Weeks Student Workload Hours Activity Hours Weeks Student Workload Hours
Lecture hours 2 6 12 Home study and work 4 9 36
Active tutorials 2 6 12 In-term exams/projects 5 2 10
Final project 6 3 18 Final project presentation 6 2 12
        Total Workload Hours = 100
*T= Teaching, P= Practice ECTS Credit = 4
Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey Last Update Date: 20/10/2025

Print this page