Course Summary Course Objectives Learning Outcomes Course Materials Teaching Methods Weekly Topics Course Schedule Office Hours Assestment ECTS Calculation Course Policies Learning Tips Print Syllabi Download as PNG

ARCH558 Educational Facilities

Syllabus   |  International University of Sarajevo  -  Last Update on Oct 10, 2025

Referencing Curricula

Syllabus Quick Jump

Search and navigate to any syllabus instantly

HOSTED BY

Architecture

- - | 4 ECTS Credits | International University of Sarajevo

Academic Year
-
Semester
-
Course Code
ARCH558
Weekly Hours
3 Teaching + 0 Practice
ECTS
4
Prerequisites
None
Teaching Mode Delivery
Prerequisite For
-
Teaching Mode Delivery Notes
-
Cycle
II Cycle
Prof. Jane Doe

Nerma Omićević

Course Lecturer

Position
Assistant Professor Dr.
Email
nomicevic@ius.edu.ba
Phone
033 957
Assistant(s)
-
Assistant E-mail
-

Course Objectives

The course gives foundations for architectural design of educational buildings engaging issues of space, organization, circulation, use, structure and material.

Learning Outcomes

After successful completion of the course, the student will be able to:

1
Recognize different types of educational buildings
2
Identify basic principles of space organisation within educational building
3
Link urban site and context with program requirements
4
Translate basic program requirements into spatial strategies and design deliverables
5
Conduct design research, site analysis, concept development, functional analysis, spatial planning and environmental aspects
6
Present the idea graphically and orally

Course Materials

Required Textbook

Meuser, N. School Buildings: Construction and Design Manual, DOM Publishers, 2014 Kramer, S. Building to Educate: School Architecture & Design, Braun Publishing, 2018

Additional Literature

Teaching Methods

Lecture
Class discussions and presentations with examples.

Weekly Topics

This weekly planning is subject to change with advance notice.
Week Topic Readings / References
1 Introduction to the course; general information
2 Historical development of school buildings Meuser, N.; Kramer, S.
3 Contemporary principles of education system Meuser, N.; Kramer, S.
4 Spatial-functional groups and spatial configuration of school buildings Meuser, N.; Kramer, S.
5 Urbanistic, architectural and ambiental aspects in the planning of school buildings Meuser, N.; Kramer, S.
6 Architectural programming of school buildings Meuser, N.; Kramer, S.
7 Analysis of architectural types and functional-spatial units of school buildings Meuser, N.; Kramer, S.
8 Mid term exam
9 Psychology and education of children and young adults Meuser, N.; Kramer, S.
10 Educational process and school design for impared and disabled children Meuser, N.; Kramer, S.
11 Students' presentation
12 Students' presentation
13 Students' presentation
14 Students' presentation
15 Students' presentation

Course Schedule (All Sections)

Course Schedules with all sections will be available here soon.

Office Hours & Room

Course Office hours will be available here soon.

Assessment Methods and Criteria

Assessment Components

40%x1
Final Exam
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1  2  3  4  5  6

30%x1
Assignment
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1  2  3  4  5  6

3%x1
Mid-term evaluation
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  5  6

IUS Grading System

Grading Scale IUS Grading System IUS Coeff. Letter (B&H) Numerical (B&H)
0 - 44 F 0 F 5
45 - 54 E 1
55 - 64 C 2 E 6
65 - 69 C+ 2.3 D 7
70 -74 B- 2.7
75 - 79 B 3 C 8
80 - 84 B+ 3.3
85 - 94 A- 3.7 B 9
95 - 100 A 4 A 10

IUS Grading System

Letter marks that do not affect student's CGPA:
  • "IP" – In progress is assigned for recording unfulfilled student obligations related to graduation project/thesis/dissertation and internship.
  • "S" – Satisfactory is assigned to a student who passed the examinations that are not numerically graded or whose written assignment has been accepted.
  • "U" – Unsatisfactory is assigned to a student who failed to pass the examinations that are not numerically graded.
  • "W" – Withdrawal signifies that student has withdrawn from the relevant course.
Additional letter mark that affects student's CGPA:

"N/A" – Not attending, and it is assigned to a student who is suspended from the course or who does not meet the minimal requirement for attendance on lectures or tutorials. The course lecturer must follow the attendance policy and assign "N/A" in each case of a student failing attendance.

Late Work Policy

Information about late submission policies will be shared during class and posted in this section. Please check back for official guidelines.

ECTS Credit Calculation

📚 Student Workload

This 4 ECTS credit course corresponds to 100 hours of total student workload, distributed as follows:

Lecture Hours

18 hours ⏳ (9 week × 2 h)

Assignments

12 hours ⏳ (3 week × 4 h)

Active tutorials

10 hours ⏳ (5 week × 2 h)

Home study

48 hours ⏳ (12 week × 4 h)

In-term exam study

6 hours ⏳ (1 week × 6 h)

Final exam study

6 hours ⏳ (1 week × 6 h)

100 Total Workload Hours

4 ECTS Credits


Course Policies

Academic Integrity

All work submitted must be your own. Plagiarism, cheating, or any form of academic dishonesty will result in disciplinary action according to university policies. When in doubt about citation practices, consult the instructor.

Attendance Policy

Students are expected to adhere to the attendance requirements as outlined in the International University of Sarajevo Study Rules and Regulations. Excessive absences, whether excused or unexcused, may impact academic performance and eligibility for assessment. Mandatory sessions (e.g., labs, workshops) require attendance unless formally exempted. For detailed policies on absences, documentation, and penalties, please refer to the official university regulations.

Technology & AI Policy

Laptops/tablets may be used for note-taking only during lectures. Phones should be silenced and put away during all class sessions. Audio/video recording requires prior permission from the instructor.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Usage: The use of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini) varies by assessment component. Please refer to the AI usage indicator next to each assessment item in the Assessment Methods and Criteria section above. Submitting AI-generated content as your own work, where AI is not explicitly allowed, constitutes an academic integrity violation.

Communication Policy

All course-related communication should occur through official university channels (institutional email or SIS). Emails should include [ARCH558] in the subject line.

Academic Quality Assurance Policy

Course Academic Quality Assurance is achieved through Semester Student Survey. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.

More info

Article 112: Evaluation of Work of the Academic Staff

  1. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.
  2. Evaluation of work of each academic staff member is to be carried out in accordance with the Statute of the institution of higher education by the institution as well as by students.
  3. The institutions of higher education are obliged to carry out a students’ evaluation survey on the academic staff performance after the end of each semester, or after the completed teaching cycle for the subject taught.
  4. Evaluation must evaluate: lecture quality, student-academic staff interaction, correctness of communication, teacher’s attitudes towards students attending the teaching activities and at assessments, availability of suggested reading material, attendance and punctuality of the teacher, along with other criteria which are defined in the Statute.
  5. The institution of higher education by a specific act determines the procedure for evaluation of the academic staff performance, the content of survey forms, the manner of conducting the evaluation, grading criteria for the evaluation, as well as adequate measures for the academic staff who received negative evaluation for two consecutive years.
  6. The evaluation of the academic staff performance is an integral process of establishment the quality assurance system, or self-control and internal quality assurance.
  7. Results of the evaluation of the academic staff performance are to be adequately analyzed by the institution of higher education, and the decision of the head of the organizational unit about the employee’s work performance is an integral part of the personal file of each member of academic staff.

Learning Tips

Engage Actively

Be prepared to contribute thoughtfully during class discussions, labs, or collaborative work. Active participation deepens understanding and encourages critical thinking.

Read and Review Purposefully

Complete assigned readings or prep materials before class. Take notes, highlight key ideas, and jot down questions. Aim to grasp core concepts and their applications—not just facts.

Think Critically in Assignments

Use course frameworks or methodologies to analyze problems, case studies, or projects. Begin early to allow time for reflection and refinement. Seek feedback to improve your work.

Ask Questions Early

Don’t hesitate to reach out when something is unclear. Use office hours, discussion boards, or peer networks to clarify concepts and stay on track.

Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey

Syllabus Last Updated on Oct 10, 2025 | International University of Sarajevo

Print Syllabus  

 

 

Referencing Curricula Print this page

Course Code Course Title Weekly Hours* ECTS Weekly Class Schedule
T P
ARCH558 Educational Facilities 3 0 4
Prerequisite None It is a prerequisite to -
Lecturer Nerma Omićević Office Hours / Room / Phone
Wednesday:
9:30-12:00
Thursday:
9:30-12:00
A F3.18 - 033 957 213
E-mail nomicevic@ius.edu.ba
Assistant Assistant E-mail
Course Objectives The course gives foundations for architectural design of educational buildings engaging issues of space, organization, circulation, use, structure and material.
Textbook Meuser, N. School Buildings: Construction and Design Manual, DOM Publishers, 2014 Kramer, S. Building to Educate: School Architecture & Design, Braun Publishing, 2018
Additional Literature
Learning Outcomes After successful  completion of the course, the student will be able to:
  1. Recognize different types of educational buildings
  2. Identify basic principles of space organisation within educational building
  3. Link urban site and context with program requirements
  4. Translate basic program requirements into spatial strategies and design deliverables
  5. Conduct design research, site analysis, concept development, functional analysis, spatial planning and environmental aspects
  6. Present the idea graphically and orally
Teaching Methods Lecture, class discussions and presentations with examples.
Teaching Method Delivery Teaching Method Delivery Notes
WEEK TOPIC REFERENCE
Week 1 Introduction to the course; general information
Week 2 Historical development of school buildings Meuser, N.; Kramer, S.
Week 3 Contemporary principles of education system Meuser, N.; Kramer, S.
Week 4 Spatial-functional groups and spatial configuration of school buildings Meuser, N.; Kramer, S.
Week 5 Urbanistic, architectural and ambiental aspects in the planning of school buildings Meuser, N.; Kramer, S.
Week 6 Architectural programming of school buildings Meuser, N.; Kramer, S.
Week 7 Analysis of architectural types and functional-spatial units of school buildings Meuser, N.; Kramer, S.
Week 8 Mid term exam
Week 9 Psychology and education of children and young adults Meuser, N.; Kramer, S.
Week 10 Educational process and school design for impared and disabled children Meuser, N.; Kramer, S.
Week 11 Students' presentation
Week 12 Students' presentation
Week 13 Students' presentation
Week 14 Students' presentation
Week 15 Students' presentation
Assessment Methods and Criteria Evaluation Tool Quantity Weight Alignment with LOs AI Usage
Final Exam 1 40 1,2,3,4,5,6 Not Allowed
Semester Evaluation Components
Assignment 1 30 1,2,3,4,5,6 Not Allowed
Mid-term evaluation 1 3 5,6 Not Allowed
***     ECTS Credit Calculation     ***
 Activity Hours Weeks Student Workload Hours Activity Hours Weeks Student Workload Hours
Lecture Hours 2 9 18 Assignments 4 3 12
Active tutorials 2 5 10 Home study 4 12 48
In-term exam study 6 1 6 Final exam study 6 1 6
        Total Workload Hours = 100
*T= Teaching, P= Practice ECTS Credit = 4
Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey Last Update Date: 20/10/2025

Print this page