Course Summary Course Objectives Learning Outcomes Course Materials Teaching Methods Weekly Topics Course Schedule Office Hours Assestment ECTS Calculation Course Policies Learning Tips Print Syllabi Download as PNG

CS553 Research Methodologies in Computer Science

Syllabus   |  International University of Sarajevo  -  Last Update on Sep 09, 2026

Referencing Curricula

Syllabus Quick Jump

Search and navigate to any syllabus instantly

HOSTED BY

Computer Sciences and Engineering

Fall 2026 - 2027 | 6 ECTS Credits | International University of Sarajevo

Academic Year
2026 - 2027
Semester
Fall
Course Code
CS553
Weekly Hours
3 Teaching + 0 Practice
ECTS
6
Prerequisites
None
Teaching Mode Delivery
Face-to-face
Prerequisite For
-
Teaching Mode Delivery Notes
-
Cycle
II Cycle
Prof. Jane Doe

Özge Büyükdağlı

Course Lecturer

Position
Associate Professor Dr.
Email
obuyukdagli@ius.edu.ba
Phone
033 957 224
Assistant(s)
-
Assistant E-mail
-

Course Objectives

This course develops methodological skills needed for research in computing disciplines. It covers defining a research problem, reviewing and synthesising relevant literature, selecting an appropriate research design and approach, planning data collection and analysis, and applying research ethics and academic integrity. The course concludes with a structured research proposal that integrates these elements into a coherent study plan.

Learning Outcomes

After successful completion of the course, the student will be able to:

1
Formulate a computing research problem and research questions.
2
Synthesise relevant literature and identify a research gap.
3
Select an appropriate research design and approach and outline the planned data collection and analysis.
4
Evaluate the ethical implications of conducting research and apply principles of research ethics and academic integrity.
5
Develop and present a well-structured research proposal in written and oral form.

Course Materials

Required Textbook

Thiel, D. V. (2014). Research methods for engineers. Cambridge University Press.

Additional Literature
Montgomery, D. C. (2019). Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Teaching Methods

Lectures
Workshops
Discussions
Peer-evaluation presentations
Peer-led instruction
Supervised research assignments

Weekly Topics

This weekly planning is subject to change with advance notice.
Week Topic Readings / References
1 Course Introduction Syllabus
Assignment: Prepare research snapshot for next week.
2 The Research Process + Research Snapshot Presentations Thiel Ch. 1
3 📍 Problem, Literature & Purpose Thiel Ch.1.3, Ch.3.1–3.2
Assignment: Pick your anchor/core paper tied to your actual intended thesis topic, since your Week 15 presentation will be reviewed by faculty.
4 Literature Review Workshop Thiel Ch.2+ Creswell Ch.2
Start working on literature review, deadline: 3 weeks
5 Qualitative Methods Creswell & Creswell Ch.9
6 Quantitative Methods & Hypotheses Creswell Ch.7–8; Thiel Ch.3.3–3.5
Assignment: Lock in your method: qualitative or quantitative/simulation form
7 In class activity: Peer evaluation
Assignment: Literature review draft due (submit before the lecture)
Assignment: Peer evaluation form submitted (due end of class)
8 Midterm
9 Design of Experiments Presentation Recorded Lecture + Montgomery Ch.1, Ch.3
Assignment: submit questions for Week 10 discussion
10 Design of Experiments Q&A Montgomery Ch.1, Ch.3
11 Research Ethics & IP Thiel Ch.1.4, Ch.2.2, Ch.6.3
12 Peer Evaluation Session
Assignment: Submit peer evaluation form
13 Research in Practice Seminar
14 Final revision and presentation preparation
Final Proposal Submission Deadline!
15 Final Research Proposal Presentations

Detailed Weekly Plan

Week 1: Course Introduction
Assignment: Prepare research snapshot for next week.
Week 3: Problem, Literature & Purpose
Assignment: Pick your anchor/core paper tied to your actual intended thesis topic, since your Week 15 presentation will be reviewed by faculty.
Week 4: Literature Review Workshop
Start working on literature review, deadline: 3 weeks
Week 6: Quantitative Methods & Hypotheses
Assignment: Lock in your method: qualitative or quantitative/simulation form
Week 7: In class activity: Peer evaluation
Assignment: Literature review draft due (submit before the lecture)
Assignment: Peer evaluation form submitted (due end of class)
Week 9: Design of Experiments Presentation
Assignment: submit questions for Week 10 discussion
Week 12: Peer Evaluation Session
Assignment: Submit peer evaluation form
Week 14: Final revision and presentation preparation
Final Proposal Submission Deadline!

Course Schedule (All Sections)

SectionTypeDay 1Venue 1Day 2Venue 2
CS553.1 Course Wednesday 17:00 - 19:50 A F1.4 - Class/Laboratory - -

Office Hours & Room

DayTimeOfficeNotes
Monday 12:00 - 15:00 A F1.8
Wednesday 10:00 - 12:00 A F1.8

Assessment Methods and Criteria

Assessment Components

40%x1
Research Proposal
AI: Consult Instructor

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1   2   3   4  5

20%x1
Literature Review Report
AI: Consult Instructor

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1   2   3   4

30%x1
Participation (7 assignments)
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1   2   3   4   5

10%x1
Presentation
AI: Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  5

IUS Grading System

Grading Scale IUS Grading System IUS Coeff. Letter (B&H) Numerical (B&H)
0 - 44 F 0 F 5
45 - 54 E 1
55 - 64 C 2 E 6
65 - 69 C+ 2.3 D 7
70 -74 B- 2.7
75 - 79 B 3 C 8
80 - 84 B+ 3.3
85 - 94 A- 3.7 B 9
95 - 100 A 4 A 10

IUS Grading System

Letter marks that do not affect student's CGPA:
  • "IP" – In progress is assigned for recording unfulfilled student obligations related to graduation project/thesis/dissertation and internship.
  • "S" – Satisfactory is assigned to a student who passed the examinations that are not numerically graded or whose written assignment has been accepted.
  • "U" – Unsatisfactory is assigned to a student who failed to pass the examinations that are not numerically graded.
  • "W" – Withdrawal signifies that student has withdrawn from the relevant course.
Additional letter mark that affects student's CGPA:

"N/A" – Not attending, and it is assigned to a student who is suspended from the course or who does not meet the minimal requirement for attendance on lectures or tutorials. The course lecturer must follow the attendance policy and assign "N/A" in each case of a student failing attendance.

Late Work Policy

Information about late submission policies will be shared during class and posted in this section. Please check back for official guidelines.

ECTS Credit Calculation

📚 Student Workload

This 6 ECTS credit course corresponds to 150 hours of total student workload, distributed as follows:

Lectures and presentations

42 hours ⏳ (14 week × 3 h)

Home study (reading and preparation)

28 hours ⏳ (14 week × 2 h)

Assignments

60 hours ⏳ (10 week × 6 h)

Final proposal integration and presentation preparation

16 hours ⏳ (4 week × 4 h)

Individual consultations and feedback sessions

4 hours ⏳ (4 week × 1 h)

150 Total Workload Hours

6 ECTS Credits


Course Policies

Academic Integrity

All work submitted must be your own. Plagiarism, cheating, or any form of academic dishonesty will result in disciplinary action according to university policies. When in doubt about citation practices, consult the instructor.

Attendance Policy

Students are expected to adhere to the attendance requirements as outlined in the International University of Sarajevo Study Rules and Regulations. Excessive absences, whether excused or unexcused, may impact academic performance and eligibility for assessment. Mandatory sessions (e.g., labs, workshops) require attendance unless formally exempted. For detailed policies on absences, documentation, and penalties, please refer to the official university regulations.

Technology & AI Policy

Laptops/tablets may be used for note-taking only during lectures. Phones should be silenced and put away during all class sessions. Audio/video recording requires prior permission from the instructor.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Usage: The use of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini) varies by assessment component. Please refer to the AI usage indicator next to each assessment item in the Assessment Methods and Criteria section above. Submitting AI-generated content as your own work, where AI is not explicitly allowed, constitutes an academic integrity violation.

Communication Policy

All course-related communication should occur through official university channels (institutional email or SIS). Emails should include [CS553] in the subject line.

Academic Quality Assurance Policy

Course Academic Quality Assurance is achieved through Semester Student Survey. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.

More info

Article 112: Evaluation of Work of the Academic Staff

  1. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.
  2. Evaluation of work of each academic staff member is to be carried out in accordance with the Statute of the institution of higher education by the institution as well as by students.
  3. The institutions of higher education are obliged to carry out a students’ evaluation survey on the academic staff performance after the end of each semester, or after the completed teaching cycle for the subject taught.
  4. Evaluation must evaluate: lecture quality, student-academic staff interaction, correctness of communication, teacher’s attitudes towards students attending the teaching activities and at assessments, availability of suggested reading material, attendance and punctuality of the teacher, along with other criteria which are defined in the Statute.
  5. The institution of higher education by a specific act determines the procedure for evaluation of the academic staff performance, the content of survey forms, the manner of conducting the evaluation, grading criteria for the evaluation, as well as adequate measures for the academic staff who received negative evaluation for two consecutive years.
  6. The evaluation of the academic staff performance is an integral process of establishment the quality assurance system, or self-control and internal quality assurance.
  7. Results of the evaluation of the academic staff performance are to be adequately analyzed by the institution of higher education, and the decision of the head of the organizational unit about the employee’s work performance is an integral part of the personal file of each member of academic staff.

Learning Tips

Engage Actively

Be prepared to contribute thoughtfully during class discussions, labs, or collaborative work. Active participation deepens understanding and encourages critical thinking.

Read and Review Purposefully

Complete assigned readings or prep materials before class. Take notes, highlight key ideas, and jot down questions. Aim to grasp core concepts and their applications—not just facts.

Think Critically in Assignments

Use course frameworks or methodologies to analyze problems, case studies, or projects. Begin early to allow time for reflection and refinement. Seek feedback to improve your work.

Ask Questions Early

Don’t hesitate to reach out when something is unclear. Use office hours, discussion boards, or peer networks to clarify concepts and stay on track.

Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey

Syllabus Last Updated on Sep 09, 2026 | International University of Sarajevo

Print Syllabus  

 

 

Referencing Curricula Print this page

Course Code Course Title Weekly Hours* ECTS Weekly Class Schedule
T P
CS553 Research Methodologies in Computer Science 3 0 6 Wednesday 17:00-20:00
Prerequisite None It is a prerequisite to -
Lecturer Özge Büyükdağlı Office Hours / Room / Phone
Monday:
12:00-15:00
Wednesday:
10:00-12:00
A F1.8 - 033 957 224
E-mail obuyukdagli@ius.edu.ba
Assistant Assistant E-mail
Course Objectives This course develops methodological skills needed for research in computing disciplines. It covers defining a research problem, reviewing and synthesising relevant literature, selecting an appropriate research design and approach, planning data collection and analysis, and applying research ethics and academic integrity. The course concludes with a structured research proposal that integrates these elements into a coherent study plan.
Textbook Thiel, D. V. (2014). Research methods for engineers. Cambridge University Press.
Additional Literature
  • Montgomery, D. C. (2019). Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Learning Outcomes After successful  completion of the course, the student will be able to:
  1. Formulate a computing research problem and research questions.
  2. Synthesise relevant literature and identify a research gap.
  3. Select an appropriate research design and approach and outline the planned data collection and analysis.
  4. Evaluate the ethical implications of conducting research and apply principles of research ethics and academic integrity.
  5. Develop and present a well-structured research proposal in written and oral form.
Teaching Methods Lectures, workshops, discussions, peer-evaluation presentations, peer-led instruction, supervised research assignments
Teaching Method Delivery Face-to-face Teaching Method Delivery Notes
WEEK TOPIC REFERENCE
Week 1 Course Introduction Syllabus
Week 2 The Research Process + Research Snapshot Presentations Thiel Ch. 1
Week 3 Problem, Literature & Purpose Thiel Ch.1.3, Ch.3.1–3.2
Week 4 Literature Review Workshop Thiel Ch.2+ Creswell Ch.2
Week 5 Qualitative Methods Creswell & Creswell Ch.9
Week 6 Quantitative Methods & Hypotheses Creswell Ch.7–8; Thiel Ch.3.3–3.5
Week 7 In class activity: Peer evaluation
Week 8 Midterm
Week 9 Design of Experiments Presentation Recorded Lecture + Montgomery Ch.1, Ch.3
Week 10 Design of Experiments Q&A Montgomery Ch.1, Ch.3
Week 11 Research Ethics & IP Thiel Ch.1.4, Ch.2.2, Ch.6.3
Week 12 Peer Evaluation Session
Week 13 Research in Practice Seminar
Week 14 Final revision and presentation preparation
Week 15 Final Research Proposal Presentations
Assessment Methods and Criteria Evaluation Tool Quantity Weight Alignment with LOs AI Usage
Research Proposal 1 40 1, 2, 3, 4,5 Consult Instructor
Semester Evaluation Components
Literature Review Report 1 20 1, 2, 3, 4 Consult Instructor
Participation (7 assignments) 1 30 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Not Allowed
Presentation 1 10 5 Allowed
***     ECTS Credit Calculation     ***
 Activity Hours Weeks Student Workload Hours Activity Hours Weeks Student Workload Hours
Lectures and presentations 3 14 42 Home study (reading and preparation) 2 14 28
Assignments 6 10 60 Final proposal integration and presentation preparation 4 4 16
Individual consultations and feedback sessions 1 4 4 0
0 0
0 0
        Total Workload Hours = 150
*T= Teaching, P= Practice ECTS Credit = 6
Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey Last Update Date: 30/09/2026
Detailed Weekly Plan
Week 1: Course Introduction Assignment: Prepare research snapshot for next week.
Week 3: Problem, Literature & Purpose Assignment: Pick your anchor/core paper tied to your actual intended thesis topic, since your Week 15 presentation will be reviewed by faculty.
Week 4: Literature Review Workshop Start working on literature review, deadline: 3 weeks
Week 6: Quantitative Methods & Hypotheses Assignment: Lock in your method: qualitative or quantitative/simulation form
Week 7: In class activity: Peer evaluation Assignment: Literature review draft due (submit before the lecture)Assignment: Peer evaluation form submitted (due end of class)
Week 9: Design of Experiments Presentation Assignment: submit questions for Week 10 discussion
Week 12: Peer Evaluation Session Assignment: Submit peer evaluation form
Week 14: Final revision and presentation preparation Final Proposal Submission Deadline!

Detailed Weekly Plan

Week 1: Course Introduction
Assignment: Prepare research snapshot for next week.
Week 3: Problem, Literature & Purpose
Assignment: Pick your anchor/core paper tied to your actual intended thesis topic, since your Week 15 presentation will be reviewed by faculty.
Week 4: Literature Review Workshop
Start working on literature review, deadline: 3 weeks
Week 6: Quantitative Methods & Hypotheses
Assignment: Lock in your method: qualitative or quantitative/simulation form
Week 7: In class activity: Peer evaluation
Assignment: Literature review draft due (submit before the lecture)
Assignment: Peer evaluation form submitted (due end of class)
Week 9: Design of Experiments Presentation
Assignment: submit questions for Week 10 discussion
Week 12: Peer Evaluation Session
Assignment: Submit peer evaluation form
Week 14: Final revision and presentation preparation
Final Proposal Submission Deadline!

Print this page