Course Summary Course Objectives Learning Outcomes Course Materials Teaching Methods Weekly Topics Course Schedule Office Hours Assestment ECTS Calculation Course Policies Learning Tips Print Syllabi Download as PNG

ELT565 Evaluation in English Language Teaching

Syllabus   |  International University of Sarajevo  -  Last Update on Mar 03, 2026

Referencing Curricula

Syllabus Quick Jump

Search and navigate to any syllabus instantly

HOSTED BY

English language and literature, Teaching

Spring 2025 - 2026 | 6 ECTS Credits | International University of Sarajevo

Academic Year
2025 - 2026
Semester
Spring
Course Code
ELT565
Weekly Hours
2 Teaching + 1 Practice
ECTS
6
Prerequisites
None
Teaching Mode Delivery
Face-to-face
Prerequisite For
-
Teaching Mode Delivery Notes
-
Cycle
II Cycle
Prof. Jane Doe

Almasa Mulalić

Course Lecturer

Position
Full Professor Dr.
Email
amulalic@ius.edu.ba
Phone
033 957 -
Assistant(s)
-
Assistant E-mail
-

Course Objectives

-develop knowledge and understanding of the basic principles of assessment of students learning a foreign language -provide practical experience in developing plans and projects for assessment and evaluation of students and educational intervention. -introduces students with basic skills for analyzing and presenting data -develop an understanding of the basic principles of standardized testing

Learning Outcomes

After successful completion of the course, the student will be able to:

1
Use knowledge and understanding of basic principles of assessment
2
Demonstrate practical experience in developing plans and projects for assessment and evaluation of students and education interventions
3
Use the skills acquired on this subject to analyze and present data
4
Developed quantitative and high-quality instruments for collecting data related to student evaluation
5
Employ standardized assessments themselves and develop student evaluation tests
6
Conducting quality educational evaluations of the student

Course Materials

Required Textbook

Fulcher, G. and Davidson, F. (2012) The Routledge Handbook of Language Testing. Routledge.

Additional Literature
Huges. A. (1992). Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press. Mousavi, S. A. (2009). An encyclopedic dictionary of language testing (4th ed.).Tehran, Iran; Rahnama Publications. Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F. (Eds.). (2012). The Routledge handbook of language testing. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. Kunnan, A. J. (2014). The companion to language assessment. New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons. Brown, H. D., Abeywickrama, P. (1918). Language Assessment, Principles and Classroom Practices. Pearson.

Teaching Methods

Lectures in the form of short lectures and examinations; case research (through group analysis and discussion); analysis of peer presentation (through providing peer feedback); written assignments (through topics that have been previously determined
Which will require research and synthesis of collected data); student presentations

Weekly Topics

This weekly planning is subject to change with advance notice.
Week Topic Readings / References
1 Conceptions of validity Textbook; 21-34
2 Articulating a validity argument Textbook; 34-48
3 Validity issues in designing accommodations for English language learners Textbook; 48-63
4 Classroom assessment Textbook; 66-78
5 Washback Textbook; 79-92
6 Assessing young learners Textbook; 93-105
7 Diagnostic assessment in language classrooms Textbook; 120-134
8 MIDTERM EXAM Textbook; 1-190
9 Designing language tests for specific social uses Textbook; 136-149
10 Language assessment for immigration and citizenship Textbook; 161-177
11 Social dimensions of language testing Textbook; 178-194
12 Test specifications and criterion referenced assessment Textbook; 195-207
13 Evidence-centered design in language testing Textbook; 208-222
14 Claims, evidence, and inference in performance assessment 223-234
15 Revission additional literature

Course Schedule (All Sections)

SectionTypeDay 1Venue 1Day 2Venue 2
ELT565.1 Course Monday 17:00 - 19:50 B F2.6 - -

Office Hours & Room

DayTimeOfficeNotes
Monday 09:00 - 11:00 B F2.7C
Tuesday 09:00 - 11:00 B F2.7C
Wednesday 09:00 - 11:00 B F2.7C
Thursday 09:00 - 11:00 B F2.7C
Friday 09:00 - 11:00 B F2.7C

Assessment Methods and Criteria

Assessment Components

40%x1
Final Exam
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1   2   3   4

40%x1
Term Project
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  2   3

20%x1
Presentation
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1   2   4

IUS Grading System

Grading Scale IUS Grading System IUS Coeff. Letter (B&H) Numerical (B&H)
0 - 44 F 0 F 5
45 - 54 E 1
55 - 64 C 2 E 6
65 - 69 C+ 2.3 D 7
70 -74 B- 2.7
75 - 79 B 3 C 8
80 - 84 B+ 3.3
85 - 94 A- 3.7 B 9
95 - 100 A 4 A 10

IUS Grading System

Letter marks that do not affect student's CGPA:
  • "IP" – In progress is assigned for recording unfulfilled student obligations related to graduation project/thesis/dissertation and internship.
  • "S" – Satisfactory is assigned to a student who passed the examinations that are not numerically graded or whose written assignment has been accepted.
  • "U" – Unsatisfactory is assigned to a student who failed to pass the examinations that are not numerically graded.
  • "W" – Withdrawal signifies that student has withdrawn from the relevant course.
Additional letter mark that affects student's CGPA:

"N/A" – Not attending, and it is assigned to a student who is suspended from the course or who does not meet the minimal requirement for attendance on lectures or tutorials. The course lecturer must follow the attendance policy and assign "N/A" in each case of a student failing attendance.

Late Work Policy

Information about late submission policies will be shared during class and posted in this section. Please check back for official guidelines.

ECTS Credit Calculation

📚 Student Workload

This 6 ECTS credit course corresponds to 150 hours of total student workload, distributed as follows:

Lecture hours

45 hours ⏳ (15 week × 3 h)

Assignments

40 hours ⏳ (4 week × 10 h)

Active tutorials

21 hours ⏳ (7 week × 3 h)

Home study

14 hours ⏳ (14 week × 1 h)

In term exam study

10 hours ⏳ (1 week × 10 h)

Final exam study

14 hours ⏳ (1 week × 14 h)

Term project presentation

6 hours ⏳ (2 week × 3 h)

150 Total Workload Hours

6 ECTS Credits


Course Policies

Academic Integrity

All work submitted must be your own. Plagiarism, cheating, or any form of academic dishonesty will result in disciplinary action according to university policies. When in doubt about citation practices, consult the instructor.

Attendance Policy

Students are expected to adhere to the attendance requirements as outlined in the International University of Sarajevo Study Rules and Regulations. Excessive absences, whether excused or unexcused, may impact academic performance and eligibility for assessment. Mandatory sessions (e.g., labs, workshops) require attendance unless formally exempted. For detailed policies on absences, documentation, and penalties, please refer to the official university regulations.

Technology & AI Policy

Laptops/tablets may be used for note-taking only during lectures. Phones should be silenced and put away during all class sessions. Audio/video recording requires prior permission from the instructor.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Usage: The use of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini) varies by assessment component. Please refer to the AI usage indicator next to each assessment item in the Assessment Methods and Criteria section above. Submitting AI-generated content as your own work, where AI is not explicitly allowed, constitutes an academic integrity violation.

Communication Policy

All course-related communication should occur through official university channels (institutional email or SIS). Emails should include [ELT565] in the subject line.

Academic Quality Assurance Policy

Course Academic Quality Assurance is achieved through Semester Student Survey. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.

More info

Article 112: Evaluation of Work of the Academic Staff

  1. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.
  2. Evaluation of work of each academic staff member is to be carried out in accordance with the Statute of the institution of higher education by the institution as well as by students.
  3. The institutions of higher education are obliged to carry out a students’ evaluation survey on the academic staff performance after the end of each semester, or after the completed teaching cycle for the subject taught.
  4. Evaluation must evaluate: lecture quality, student-academic staff interaction, correctness of communication, teacher’s attitudes towards students attending the teaching activities and at assessments, availability of suggested reading material, attendance and punctuality of the teacher, along with other criteria which are defined in the Statute.
  5. The institution of higher education by a specific act determines the procedure for evaluation of the academic staff performance, the content of survey forms, the manner of conducting the evaluation, grading criteria for the evaluation, as well as adequate measures for the academic staff who received negative evaluation for two consecutive years.
  6. The evaluation of the academic staff performance is an integral process of establishment the quality assurance system, or self-control and internal quality assurance.
  7. Results of the evaluation of the academic staff performance are to be adequately analyzed by the institution of higher education, and the decision of the head of the organizational unit about the employee’s work performance is an integral part of the personal file of each member of academic staff.

Learning Tips

Engage Actively

Be prepared to contribute thoughtfully during class discussions, labs, or collaborative work. Active participation deepens understanding and encourages critical thinking.

Read and Review Purposefully

Complete assigned readings or prep materials before class. Take notes, highlight key ideas, and jot down questions. Aim to grasp core concepts and their applications—not just facts.

Think Critically in Assignments

Use course frameworks or methodologies to analyze problems, case studies, or projects. Begin early to allow time for reflection and refinement. Seek feedback to improve your work.

Ask Questions Early

Don’t hesitate to reach out when something is unclear. Use office hours, discussion boards, or peer networks to clarify concepts and stay on track.

Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey

Syllabus Last Updated on Mar 03, 2026 | International University of Sarajevo

Print Syllabus  

 

 

Referencing Curricula Print this page

Course Code Course Title Weekly Hours* ECTS Weekly Class Schedule
T P
ELT565 Evaluation in English Language Teaching 2 1 6 Monday 17:00-19:50
Prerequisite None It is a prerequisite to -
Lecturer Almasa Mulalić Office Hours / Room / Phone
Monday:
9:00-11:00
Tuesday:
9:00-11:00
Wednesday:
9:00-11:00
Thursday:
9:00-11:00
Friday:
9:00-11:00
B F2.7C
E-mail amulalic@ius.edu.ba
Assistant Assistant E-mail
Course Objectives -develop knowledge and understanding of the basic principles of assessment of students learning a foreign language
-provide practical experience in developing plans and projects for assessment and evaluation of students and educational intervention.
-introduces students with basic skills for analyzing and presenting data
-develop an understanding of the basic principles of standardized testing
Textbook Fulcher, G. and Davidson, F. (2012) The Routledge Handbook of Language Testing. Routledge.
Additional Literature
  • Huges. A. (1992). Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press.
  • Mousavi, S. A. (2009). An encyclopedic dictionary of language testing (4th ed.).Tehran, Iran; Rahnama Publications.
  • Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F. (Eds.). (2012). The Routledge handbook of language testing. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • Kunnan, A. J. (2014). The companion to language assessment. New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons.
  • Brown, H. D., Abeywickrama, P. (1918). Language Assessment, Principles and Classroom Practices. Pearson.
Learning Outcomes After successful  completion of the course, the student will be able to:
  1. Use knowledge and understanding of basic principles of assessment
  2. Demonstrate practical experience in developing plans and projects for assessment and evaluation of students and education interventions
  3. Use the skills acquired on this subject to analyze and present data
  4. Developed quantitative and high-quality instruments for collecting data related to student evaluation
  5. Employ standardized assessments themselves and develop student evaluation tests
  6. Conducting quality educational evaluations of the student
Teaching Methods Lectures in the form of short lectures and examinations; case research (through group analysis and discussion); analysis of peer presentation (through providing peer feedback); written assignments (through topics that have been previously determined, which will require research and synthesis of collected data); student presentations
Teaching Method Delivery Face-to-face Teaching Method Delivery Notes
WEEK TOPIC REFERENCE
Week 1 Conceptions of validity Textbook; 21-34
Week 2 Articulating a validity argument Textbook; 34-48
Week 3 Validity issues in designing accommodations for English language learners Textbook; 48-63
Week 4 Classroom assessment Textbook; 66-78
Week 5 Washback Textbook; 79-92
Week 6 Assessing young learners Textbook; 93-105
Week 7 Diagnostic assessment in language classrooms Textbook; 120-134
Week 8 MIDTERM EXAM Textbook; 1-190
Week 9 Designing language tests for specific social uses Textbook; 136-149
Week 10 Language assessment for immigration and citizenship Textbook; 161-177
Week 11 Social dimensions of language testing Textbook; 178-194
Week 12 Test specifications and criterion referenced assessment Textbook; 195-207
Week 13 Evidence-centered design in language testing Textbook; 208-222
Week 14 Claims, evidence, and inference in performance assessment 223-234
Week 15 Revission additional literature
Assessment Methods and Criteria Evaluation Tool Quantity Weight Alignment with LOs AI Usage
Final Exam 1 40 1, 2, 3, 4, Not Allowed
Semester Evaluation Components
Term Project 1 40 2, 3, Not Allowed
Presentation 1 20 1, 2, 4, Not Allowed
***     ECTS Credit Calculation     ***
 Activity Hours Weeks Student Workload Hours Activity Hours Weeks Student Workload Hours
Lecture hours 3 15 45 Assignments 10 4 40
Active tutorials 3 7 21 Home study 1 14 14
In term exam study 10 1 10 Final exam study 14 1 14
Term project presentation 3 2 6
        Total Workload Hours = 150
*T= Teaching, P= Practice ECTS Credit = 6
Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey Last Update Date: 23/03/2026

Print this page