Course Summary Course Objectives Learning Outcomes Course Materials Teaching Methods Weekly Topics Course Schedule Office Hours Assestment ECTS Calculation Course Policies Learning Tips Print Syllabi Download as PNG

IR211 International Relations Theories

Syllabus   |  International University of Sarajevo  -  Last Update on Mar 03, 2026

Referencing Curricula

Syllabus Quick Jump

Search and navigate to any syllabus instantly

HOSTED BY

Political Science and International Relations

Fall 2025 - 2026 | 6 ECTS Credits | International University of Sarajevo

Academic Year
2025 - 2026
Semester
Fall
Course Code
IR211
Weekly Hours
3 Teaching + 1 Practice
ECTS
6
Prerequisites
IR101
Teaching Mode Delivery
Face-to-face
Prerequisite For
-
Teaching Mode Delivery Notes
-
Cycle
I Cycle
Prof. Jane Doe

Mirsad Karić

Course Lecturer

Position
Full Professor Dr.
Email
mkaric@ius.edu.ba
Phone
033 957 420
Assistant(s)
-
Assistant E-mail
-

Course Objectives

This course introduces students to the historical development of International Relations as an academic discipline and familiarizes them with the basic ontological and epistemological assumptions underlying major IR theories. It aims to develop students’ ability to describe, compare and contrast major and selected minor theories, apply them to analyse the conceptualization of the international system and foster awareness of non-Western and alternative theoretical approaches in International Relations.

Learning Outcomes

After successful completion of the course, the student will be able to:

1
Explain the historical development of International Relations (IR) as an academic discipline.
2
Discuss the ontological and epistemological foundations of IR theories.
3
Compare and contrast major and some minor IR theories.
4
Analyse how different IR theories conceptualize the international system.
5
Recognize the variety of non-Western theoretical approaches and explain how they challenge and complement dominant Western secular-based IR theories.

Course Materials

Required Textbook

Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki & Steve Smith (eds.), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity (3rd ed.), Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2013.

Additional Literature
Stephanie Lawson, Theories of International Relations: Contending Approaches to World Politics, Polity Press: Cambridge, 2015. Karčić Hamza, American Realist and the War in Bosnia 1992-1995, Historical Views, Vol. 10, pp. 356-370. Nicholas R. Smith and Grant Dawson, Mearsheimer, Realism, and the Ukraine War, Analyse & Kritik, Vol.44, No. 2, pp. 175-200. Harald Edinger, Offensive Ideas: Structural Realism, Classical Realism and Putin’s War on Ukraine, International Affairs, Vol.98, No.6, pp.1873–1893. Andreas Krieg, The war in Gaza, the decline of US leadership and the emergence of a networked regional order, Mediterranean Politics, Vol. 30. No.4, pp.892-901. Ekinci, Didem, The War in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Turkish Parliamentary Debates (1992-1995): A Constructivist Approach, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Vol. 6, No. 22, pp.37-60. Deina Abdelkader, Nassef Manabilang Adiong & Raffaele Mauriello (eds.), Islam and International Relations: Contributions to Theory and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan: London, 2016. "

Teaching Methods

Lectures
Case studies
Text analysis and discussions

Weekly Topics

This weekly planning is subject to change with advance notice.
Week Topic Readings / References
1 Course introduction No Reading
2 Historical Development of IR Theory as an Academic Discipline Stephanie Lawson, ch. 1.
3 Classical Realism Dunne, Kurki & Smith, ch. 3
4 Structural Realism_Defensive Dunne, Kurki & Smith, ch. 4; Waltz.
5 Structural Realism_Offensive Dunne, Kurki & Smith, ch. 4; Mearsheimer.
6 Case study 1 and 2 Karčić, pp.356-370; Smith and Dawson, pp.175-200.
7 Case study 3 and 4 Edinger, pp. 1873-1893; Krieg, pp. 892-901.
8 Mid-term Exam_1_Centralized-25% No reading
9 Liberalism and Neoliberalism Dunne, Kurki & Smith, chs. 5 and 6.
10 English School Dunne, Kurki & Smith, ch. 7
11 Social Constructivism-Case Study 5 Dunne, Kurki & Smith, ch. 10; Didem, pp.37-60.
12 Feminism Dunne, Kurki & Smith, ch. 11
13 Green Theory Dunne, Kurki & Smith, ch. 14
14 Non-Western Theories in IR Deina, Nassef & Raffaele, ch. 8
15 Mid-term Exam_2_January 6, 2026-25% No Reading

Course Schedule (All Sections)

SectionTypeDay 1Venue 1Day 2Venue 2
IR211.1 Course Tuesday 09:00 - 11:50 A F1.10 - -

Office Hours & Room

DayTimeOfficeNotes
Monday 14:00 - 17:00 A F1.7
Tuesday 12:00 - 13:00 A F1.7
Thursday 12:00 - 13:00 A F1.7

Assessment Methods and Criteria

Assessment Components

40%x1
Final Exam
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1   2   3   4

50%x2
Midterm Exam
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1   2   3   4

10%x1
Attendance and Participation
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1   3   4

IUS Grading System

Grading Scale IUS Grading System IUS Coeff. Letter (B&H) Numerical (B&H)
0 - 44 F 0 F 5
45 - 54 E 1
55 - 64 C 2 E 6
65 - 69 C+ 2.3 D 7
70 -74 B- 2.7
75 - 79 B 3 C 8
80 - 84 B+ 3.3
85 - 94 A- 3.7 B 9
95 - 100 A 4 A 10

IUS Grading System

Letter marks that do not affect student's CGPA:
  • "IP" – In progress is assigned for recording unfulfilled student obligations related to graduation project/thesis/dissertation and internship.
  • "S" – Satisfactory is assigned to a student who passed the examinations that are not numerically graded or whose written assignment has been accepted.
  • "U" – Unsatisfactory is assigned to a student who failed to pass the examinations that are not numerically graded.
  • "W" – Withdrawal signifies that student has withdrawn from the relevant course.
Additional letter mark that affects student's CGPA:

"N/A" – Not attending, and it is assigned to a student who is suspended from the course or who does not meet the minimal requirement for attendance on lectures or tutorials. The course lecturer must follow the attendance policy and assign "N/A" in each case of a student failing attendance.

Late Work Policy

Information about late submission policies will be shared during class and posted in this section. Please check back for official guidelines.

ECTS Credit Calculation

📚 Student Workload

This 6 ECTS credit course corresponds to 150 hours of total student workload, distributed as follows:

Lecture Hours

36 hours ⏳ (12 week × 3 h)

Individual Learning

50 hours ⏳ (10 week × 5 h)

Midterm exam

36 hours ⏳ (4 week × 9 h)

Final exam

28 hours ⏳ (4 week × 7 h)

150 Total Workload Hours

6 ECTS Credits


Course Policies

Academic Integrity

All work submitted must be your own. Plagiarism, cheating, or any form of academic dishonesty will result in disciplinary action according to university policies. When in doubt about citation practices, consult the instructor.

Attendance Policy

Students are expected to adhere to the attendance requirements as outlined in the International University of Sarajevo Study Rules and Regulations. Excessive absences, whether excused or unexcused, may impact academic performance and eligibility for assessment. Mandatory sessions (e.g., labs, workshops) require attendance unless formally exempted. For detailed policies on absences, documentation, and penalties, please refer to the official university regulations.

Technology & AI Policy

Laptops/tablets may be used for note-taking only during lectures. Phones should be silenced and put away during all class sessions. Audio/video recording requires prior permission from the instructor.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Usage: The use of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini) varies by assessment component. Please refer to the AI usage indicator next to each assessment item in the Assessment Methods and Criteria section above. Submitting AI-generated content as your own work, where AI is not explicitly allowed, constitutes an academic integrity violation.

Communication Policy

All course-related communication should occur through official university channels (institutional email or SIS). Emails should include [IR211] in the subject line.

Academic Quality Assurance Policy

Course Academic Quality Assurance is achieved through Semester Student Survey. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.

More info

Article 112: Evaluation of Work of the Academic Staff

  1. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.
  2. Evaluation of work of each academic staff member is to be carried out in accordance with the Statute of the institution of higher education by the institution as well as by students.
  3. The institutions of higher education are obliged to carry out a students’ evaluation survey on the academic staff performance after the end of each semester, or after the completed teaching cycle for the subject taught.
  4. Evaluation must evaluate: lecture quality, student-academic staff interaction, correctness of communication, teacher’s attitudes towards students attending the teaching activities and at assessments, availability of suggested reading material, attendance and punctuality of the teacher, along with other criteria which are defined in the Statute.
  5. The institution of higher education by a specific act determines the procedure for evaluation of the academic staff performance, the content of survey forms, the manner of conducting the evaluation, grading criteria for the evaluation, as well as adequate measures for the academic staff who received negative evaluation for two consecutive years.
  6. The evaluation of the academic staff performance is an integral process of establishment the quality assurance system, or self-control and internal quality assurance.
  7. Results of the evaluation of the academic staff performance are to be adequately analyzed by the institution of higher education, and the decision of the head of the organizational unit about the employee’s work performance is an integral part of the personal file of each member of academic staff.

Learning Tips

Engage Actively

Be prepared to contribute thoughtfully during class discussions, labs, or collaborative work. Active participation deepens understanding and encourages critical thinking.

Read and Review Purposefully

Complete assigned readings or prep materials before class. Take notes, highlight key ideas, and jot down questions. Aim to grasp core concepts and their applications—not just facts.

Think Critically in Assignments

Use course frameworks or methodologies to analyze problems, case studies, or projects. Begin early to allow time for reflection and refinement. Seek feedback to improve your work.

Ask Questions Early

Don’t hesitate to reach out when something is unclear. Use office hours, discussion boards, or peer networks to clarify concepts and stay on track.

Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey

Syllabus Last Updated on Mar 03, 2026 | International University of Sarajevo

Print Syllabus  

 

 

Referencing Curricula Print this page

Course Code Course Title Weekly Hours* ECTS Weekly Class Schedule
T P
IR211 International Relations Theories 3 1 6
Prerequisite IR101 It is a prerequisite to -
Lecturer Mirsad Karić Office Hours / Room / Phone
Monday:
14:00-17:00
Tuesday:
12:00-13:00
Thursday:
12:00-13:00
A F1.7 - 033 957 420
E-mail mkaric@ius.edu.ba
Assistant Assistant E-mail
Course Objectives This course introduces students to the historical development of International Relations as an academic discipline and familiarizes them with the basic ontological and epistemological assumptions underlying major IR theories. It aims to develop students’ ability to describe, compare and contrast major and selected minor theories, apply them to analyse the conceptualization of the international system and foster awareness of non-Western and alternative theoretical approaches in International Relations.
Textbook Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki & Steve Smith (eds.), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity (3rd ed.), Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2013.
Additional Literature
  • Stephanie Lawson, Theories of International Relations: Contending Approaches to World Politics, Polity Press: Cambridge, 2015.
  • Karčić Hamza, American Realist and the War in Bosnia 1992-1995, Historical Views, Vol. 10, pp. 356-370.
  • Nicholas R. Smith and Grant Dawson, Mearsheimer, Realism, and the Ukraine War, Analyse & Kritik, Vol.44, No. 2, pp. 175-200.
  • Harald Edinger, Offensive Ideas: Structural Realism, Classical Realism and Putin’s War on Ukraine, International Affairs, Vol.98, No.6, pp.1873–1893.
  • Andreas Krieg, The war in Gaza, the decline of US leadership and the emergence of a networked regional order, Mediterranean Politics, Vol. 30. No.4, pp.892-901.
  • Ekinci, Didem, The War in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Turkish Parliamentary Debates (1992-1995): A Constructivist Approach, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Vol. 6, No. 22, pp.37-60.
  • Deina Abdelkader, Nassef Manabilang Adiong & Raffaele Mauriello (eds.), Islam and International Relations: Contributions to Theory and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan: London, 2016.
  • "
Learning Outcomes After successful  completion of the course, the student will be able to:
  1. Explain the historical development of International Relations (IR) as an academic discipline.
  2. Discuss the ontological and epistemological foundations of IR theories.
  3. Compare and contrast major and some minor IR theories.
  4. Analyse how different IR theories conceptualize the international system.
  5. Recognize the variety of non-Western theoretical approaches and explain how they challenge and complement dominant Western secular-based IR theories.
Teaching Methods Lectures, case studies, text analysis and discussions
Teaching Method Delivery Face-to-face Teaching Method Delivery Notes
WEEK TOPIC REFERENCE
Week 1 Course introduction No Reading
Week 2 Historical Development of IR Theory as an Academic Discipline Stephanie Lawson, ch. 1.
Week 3 Classical Realism Dunne, Kurki & Smith, ch. 3
Week 4 Structural Realism_Defensive Dunne, Kurki & Smith, ch. 4; Waltz.
Week 5 Structural Realism_Offensive Dunne, Kurki & Smith, ch. 4; Mearsheimer.
Week 6 Case study 1 and 2 Karčić, pp.356-370; Smith and Dawson, pp.175-200.
Week 7 Case study 3 and 4 Edinger, pp. 1873-1893; Krieg, pp. 892-901.
Week 8 Mid-term Exam_1_Centralized-25% No reading
Week 9 Liberalism and Neoliberalism Dunne, Kurki & Smith, chs. 5 and 6.
Week 10 English School Dunne, Kurki & Smith, ch. 7
Week 11 Social Constructivism-Case Study 5 Dunne, Kurki & Smith, ch. 10; Didem, pp.37-60.
Week 12 Feminism Dunne, Kurki & Smith, ch. 11
Week 13 Green Theory Dunne, Kurki & Smith, ch. 14
Week 14 Non-Western Theories in IR Deina, Nassef & Raffaele, ch. 8
Week 15 Mid-term Exam_2_January 6, 2026-25% No Reading
Assessment Methods and Criteria Evaluation Tool Quantity Weight Alignment with LOs AI Usage
Final Exam 1 40 1, 2, 3, 4 Not Allowed
Semester Evaluation Components
Midterm Exam 2 50 1, 2, 3, 4 Not Allowed
Attendance and Participation 1 10 1, 3, 4 Not Allowed
***     ECTS Credit Calculation     ***
 Activity Hours Weeks Student Workload Hours Activity Hours Weeks Student Workload Hours
Lecture Hours 3 12 36 Individual Learning 5 10 50
Midterm exam 9 4 36 Final exam 7 4 28
        Total Workload Hours = 150
*T= Teaching, P= Practice ECTS Credit = 6
Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey Last Update Date: 27/03/2026

Print this page