Course Summary Course Objectives Learning Outcomes Course Materials Teaching Methods Weekly Topics Course Schedule Office Hours Assestment ECTS Calculation Course Policies Learning Tips Print Syllabi Download as PNG

SPS606 Governance and Democracy

Syllabus   |  International University of Sarajevo  -  Last Update on Mar 03, 2026

Referencing Curricula

Syllabus Quick Jump

Search and navigate to any syllabus instantly

HOSTED BY

Social and Political Sciences

Fall 2022 - 2023 | 6 ECTS Credits | International University of Sarajevo

Academic Year
2022 - 2023
Semester
Fall
Course Code
SPS606
Weekly Hours
3 Teaching + 0 Practice
ECTS
6
Prerequisites
None
Teaching Mode Delivery
Online
Prerequisite For
-
Teaching Mode Delivery Notes
-
Cycle
III Cycle
Prof. Jane Doe

Emel Topcu

Course Lecturer

Position
Email
etopcu@ius.edu.ba
Phone
033 957
Assistant(s)
-
Assistant E-mail
-

Course Objectives

The primary objective of this doctoral course is to survey the major theoretical perspectives and issues studied in governance and democracy theories. The course will lead students to examine both important historical foundations and more recent theoretical and empirical contributions to the topic.

Learning Outcomes

After successful completion of the course, the student will be able to:

1
Analyzing and understanding the concept of democracy, democratization and governance process in worldwide.
2
Evaluate democratization and governance in the selected case and demonstrate implementation of the process.
3
Synthesize a range of literature on a research problem of government and democratization in the field of political sciences, political science theories.
4
Demonstrate appropriate methods of study for the democratization process of selected case as a scientific evaluation.

Course Materials

Required Textbook

Becker P. and Raveloson J.-A. A. (2008), What is Democracy, KMF-CNOE & NOVA STELLA. Whitehead, L. (2002), Democratization: Theory and Experience, Oxford University Press. Poguntke, T. and van Deth, J. W. (2006), Governance and Democracy Comparing National, European and International Experiences, Routledge.

Additional Literature
Gomez, P-Y. and Korine, H. (2008), Entrepreneurs and Democracy A Political Theory of Corporate Governance, Cambridge University Press. O'Donnell, G. (2010), Democracy, Agency, and the State: Theory with Comparative Intent, Oxford University Press. Magen, A., Risse, T., and Mcfaul, M. A. (2009), Promoting Democracy and The Rule of Law, Palgrave. Eriksen, E.O. (2009), The Unfinished Democratization of Europe, Oxford University Press. Brownlee, J. (2007), Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization, Cambridge University Press. Pevehouse J.C. (2005), Democracy from Above Regional Organization, Cambridge University Press. Marchhetti, R. (2008), Global Democracy: For and Against, Routledge.

Teaching Methods

The methods include lectures (which may involve PowerPoint presentations
Video
And audio aids)
Student presentations
Research papers
And class discussions.

Weekly Topics

This weekly planning is subject to change with advance notice.
Week Topic Readings / References
1 Course Introduction / What is Democracy Becker P. and Raveloson J.-A. A. (2008), Page: 4-23
2 Democracy and Democratization Whitehead, L. (2002), CH:1
3 The Drama of Democratic Transitions Whitehead, L. (2002), CH:2
4 On Civil Society Whitehead, L. (2002), CH:3
5 On Accountability and Institutional Design Whitehead, L. (2002), CH:4
6 On Political Corruption Whitehead, L. (2002), CH:5
7 On Monetary Authority Whitehead, L. (2002), CH:6
8 MID-TERM WEEK
9 On Citizen Security Whitehead, L. (2002), CH:7
10 On Comparing Democratization Processes Whitehead, L. (2002), CH:8
11 On Theory and Experience in Democratization Studies Whitehead, L. (2002), CH:10
12 Democracy and Political Change in the Third World Poguntke, T. and van Deth, J. W. (2006), CH:21
13 Democracy without Borders Poguntke, T. and van Deth, J. W. (2006), CH:10
14 The Transformation of Governance in the European Union Poguntke, T. and van Deth, J. W. (2006), CH:12
15 Review of the Semester

Course Schedule (All Sections)

Course Schedules with all sections will be available here soon.

Office Hours & Room

Course Office hours will be available here soon.

Assessment Methods and Criteria

Assessment Components

35%x1
Final Exam(Research Paper)
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes : 

30%x1
Mid-Term Exam(Research Paper)
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes : 

10%x1
Student Presentation 1
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes : 

10%x1
Student presentation 2
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes : 

15%x1
Class Participation
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes : 

IUS Grading System

Grading Scale IUS Grading System IUS Coeff. Letter (B&H) Numerical (B&H)
0 - 44 F 0 F 5
45 - 54 E 1
55 - 64 C 2 E 6
65 - 69 C+ 2.3 D 7
70 -74 B- 2.7
75 - 79 B 3 C 8
80 - 84 B+ 3.3
85 - 94 A- 3.7 B 9
95 - 100 A 4 A 10

IUS Grading System

Letter marks that do not affect student's CGPA:
  • "IP" – In progress is assigned for recording unfulfilled student obligations related to graduation project/thesis/dissertation and internship.
  • "S" – Satisfactory is assigned to a student who passed the examinations that are not numerically graded or whose written assignment has been accepted.
  • "U" – Unsatisfactory is assigned to a student who failed to pass the examinations that are not numerically graded.
  • "W" – Withdrawal signifies that student has withdrawn from the relevant course.
Additional letter mark that affects student's CGPA:

"N/A" – Not attending, and it is assigned to a student who is suspended from the course or who does not meet the minimal requirement for attendance on lectures or tutorials. The course lecturer must follow the attendance policy and assign "N/A" in each case of a student failing attendance.

Late Work Policy

Information about late submission policies will be shared during class and posted in this section. Please check back for official guidelines.

ECTS Credit Calculation

📚 Student Workload

This 6 ECTS credit course corresponds to 150 hours of total student workload, distributed as follows:

Lecture Hours

56 hours ⏳ (14 week × 4 h)

Home Study

56 hours ⏳ (14 week × 4 h)

Presentation

2 hours ⏳ (1 week × 2 h)

Research paper 1

12 hours ⏳ (6 week × 2 h)

Research paper 2

14 hours ⏳ (7 week × 2 h)

Final Exam Study

10 hours ⏳ (5 week × 2 h)

150 Total Workload Hours

6 ECTS Credits


Course Policies

Academic Integrity

All work submitted must be your own. Plagiarism, cheating, or any form of academic dishonesty will result in disciplinary action according to university policies. When in doubt about citation practices, consult the instructor.

Attendance Policy

Students are expected to adhere to the attendance requirements as outlined in the International University of Sarajevo Study Rules and Regulations. Excessive absences, whether excused or unexcused, may impact academic performance and eligibility for assessment. Mandatory sessions (e.g., labs, workshops) require attendance unless formally exempted. For detailed policies on absences, documentation, and penalties, please refer to the official university regulations.

Technology & AI Policy

Laptops/tablets may be used for note-taking only during lectures. Phones should be silenced and put away during all class sessions. Audio/video recording requires prior permission from the instructor.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Usage: The use of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini) varies by assessment component. Please refer to the AI usage indicator next to each assessment item in the Assessment Methods and Criteria section above. Submitting AI-generated content as your own work, where AI is not explicitly allowed, constitutes an academic integrity violation.

Communication Policy

All course-related communication should occur through official university channels (institutional email or SIS). Emails should include [SPS606] in the subject line.

Academic Quality Assurance Policy

Course Academic Quality Assurance is achieved through Semester Student Survey. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.

More info

Article 112: Evaluation of Work of the Academic Staff

  1. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.
  2. Evaluation of work of each academic staff member is to be carried out in accordance with the Statute of the institution of higher education by the institution as well as by students.
  3. The institutions of higher education are obliged to carry out a students’ evaluation survey on the academic staff performance after the end of each semester, or after the completed teaching cycle for the subject taught.
  4. Evaluation must evaluate: lecture quality, student-academic staff interaction, correctness of communication, teacher’s attitudes towards students attending the teaching activities and at assessments, availability of suggested reading material, attendance and punctuality of the teacher, along with other criteria which are defined in the Statute.
  5. The institution of higher education by a specific act determines the procedure for evaluation of the academic staff performance, the content of survey forms, the manner of conducting the evaluation, grading criteria for the evaluation, as well as adequate measures for the academic staff who received negative evaluation for two consecutive years.
  6. The evaluation of the academic staff performance is an integral process of establishment the quality assurance system, or self-control and internal quality assurance.
  7. Results of the evaluation of the academic staff performance are to be adequately analyzed by the institution of higher education, and the decision of the head of the organizational unit about the employee’s work performance is an integral part of the personal file of each member of academic staff.

Learning Tips

Engage Actively

Be prepared to contribute thoughtfully during class discussions, labs, or collaborative work. Active participation deepens understanding and encourages critical thinking.

Read and Review Purposefully

Complete assigned readings or prep materials before class. Take notes, highlight key ideas, and jot down questions. Aim to grasp core concepts and their applications—not just facts.

Think Critically in Assignments

Use course frameworks or methodologies to analyze problems, case studies, or projects. Begin early to allow time for reflection and refinement. Seek feedback to improve your work.

Ask Questions Early

Don’t hesitate to reach out when something is unclear. Use office hours, discussion boards, or peer networks to clarify concepts and stay on track.

Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey

Syllabus Last Updated on Mar 03, 2026 | International University of Sarajevo

Print Syllabus  

 

 

Referencing Curricula Print this page

Course Code Course Title Weekly Hours* ECTS Weekly Class Schedule
T P
SPS606 Governance and Democracy 3 0 6 Monday 17:00-19:50
Prerequisite None It is a prerequisite to -
Lecturer Emel Topcu Office Hours / Room / Phone

Currently not available

E-mail etopcu@ius.edu.ba
Assistant Assistant E-mail
Course Objectives The primary objective of this doctoral course is to survey the major theoretical perspectives and issues studied in governance and democracy theories. The course will lead students to examine both important historical foundations and more recent theoretical and empirical contributions to the topic.
Textbook Becker P. and Raveloson J.-A. A. (2008), What is Democracy, KMF-CNOE & NOVA STELLA. Whitehead, L. (2002), Democratization: Theory and Experience, Oxford University Press. Poguntke, T. and van Deth, J. W. (2006), Governance and Democracy Comparing National, European and International Experiences, Routledge.
Additional Literature
  • Gomez, P-Y. and Korine, H. (2008), Entrepreneurs and Democracy A Political Theory of Corporate Governance, Cambridge University Press.
  • O'Donnell, G. (2010), Democracy, Agency, and the State: Theory with Comparative Intent, Oxford University Press.
  • Magen, A., Risse, T., and Mcfaul, M. A. (2009), Promoting Democracy and The Rule of Law, Palgrave.
  • Eriksen, E.O. (2009), The Unfinished Democratization of Europe, Oxford University Press.
  • Brownlee, J. (2007), Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization, Cambridge University Press.
  • Pevehouse J.C. (2005), Democracy from Above Regional Organization, Cambridge University Press.
  • Marchhetti, R. (2008), Global Democracy: For and Against, Routledge.
Learning Outcomes After successful  completion of the course, the student will be able to:
  1. Analyzing and understanding the concept of democracy, democratization and governance process in worldwide.
  2. Evaluate democratization and governance in the selected case and demonstrate implementation of the process.
  3. Synthesize a range of literature on a research problem of government and democratization in the field of political sciences, political science theories.
  4. Demonstrate appropriate methods of study for the democratization process of selected case as a scientific evaluation.
Teaching Methods The methods include lectures (which may involve PowerPoint presentations, video, and audio aids), student presentations, research papers, and class discussions.
Teaching Method Delivery Online Teaching Method Delivery Notes
WEEK TOPIC REFERENCE
Week 1 Course Introduction / What is Democracy Becker P. and Raveloson J.-A. A. (2008), Page: 4-23
Week 2 Democracy and Democratization Whitehead, L. (2002), CH:1
Week 3 The Drama of Democratic Transitions Whitehead, L. (2002), CH:2
Week 4 On Civil Society Whitehead, L. (2002), CH:3
Week 5 On Accountability and Institutional Design Whitehead, L. (2002), CH:4
Week 6 On Political Corruption Whitehead, L. (2002), CH:5
Week 7 On Monetary Authority Whitehead, L. (2002), CH:6
Week 8 MID-TERM WEEK
Week 9 On Citizen Security Whitehead, L. (2002), CH:7
Week 10 On Comparing Democratization Processes Whitehead, L. (2002), CH:8
Week 11 On Theory and Experience in Democratization Studies Whitehead, L. (2002), CH:10
Week 12 Democracy and Political Change in the Third World Poguntke, T. and van Deth, J. W. (2006), CH:21
Week 13 Democracy without Borders Poguntke, T. and van Deth, J. W. (2006), CH:10
Week 14 The Transformation of Governance in the European Union Poguntke, T. and van Deth, J. W. (2006), CH:12
Week 15 Review of the Semester
Assessment Methods and Criteria Evaluation Tool Quantity Weight Alignment with LOs AI Usage
Final Exam(Research Paper) 1 35 Not Allowed
Semester Evaluation Components
Mid-Term Exam(Research Paper) 1 30 Not Allowed
Student Presentation 1 1 10 Not Allowed
Student presentation 2 1 10 Not Allowed
Class Participation 1 15 Not Allowed
***     ECTS Credit Calculation     ***
 Activity Hours Weeks Student Workload Hours Activity Hours Weeks Student Workload Hours
Lecture Hours 4 14 56 Home Study 4 14 56
Presentation 2 1 2 Research paper 1 2 6 12
Research paper 2 2 7 14 Final Exam Study 2 5 10
        Total Workload Hours = 150
*T= Teaching, P= Practice ECTS Credit = 6
Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey Last Update Date: 27/03/2026

Print this page