Course Summary Course Objectives Learning Outcomes Course Materials Teaching Methods Weekly Topics Course Schedule Office Hours Assestment ECTS Calculation Course Policies Learning Tips Print Syllabi Download as PNG

TLT214 Turkish Language IV (Turkish Sentence Knowledge)

Syllabus   |  International University of Sarajevo  -  Last Update on Feb 02, 2026

Referencing Curricula

Syllabus Quick Jump

Search and navigate to any syllabus instantly

HOSTED BY

Turkish language and literature, Teaching

Spring 2025 - 2026 | 6 ECTS Credits | International University of Sarajevo

Academic Year
2025 - 2026
Semester
Spring
Course Code
TLT214
Weekly Hours
1 Teaching + 2 Practice
ECTS
6
Prerequisites
None
Teaching Mode Delivery
Face-to-face
Prerequisite For
-
Teaching Mode Delivery Notes
-
Cycle
I Cycle
Prof. Jane Doe

Dženana Bračković

Course Lecturer

Position
Assistant Professor Dr.
Email
dzbrackovic@ius.edu.ba
Phone
033 957 425
Assistant(s)
-
Assistant E-mail
-

Course Objectives

In this course, students will learn how to evaluate Turkish syntax in practice, to analyze the syntax fragments in Turkish literary works as a whole (subject, auxiliary and predicate) and by dividing them into parts (nouns, phrases). In the second part of the course, students will learn types of sentences and analyze them through different texts.

Learning Outcomes

After successful completion of the course, the student will be able to:

Course Materials

Required Textbook

Čaušević, E. (1996). Gramatika suvremenoga turskog jezika, Zagreb, Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada. Hemgirmen, M. (2006). Türkçe Temel Dilbilgisi, Ankara, Engin.

Additional Literature
Korkmaz, Z. (2009). Türkiye Türkçesi Grameri (Şekil Bilgisi), Ankara, TDK Ergin, M. (1993). Türk Dil Bilgisi, İstanbul, Bayrak Yayınevi. Lewis, G. (2001). Turkish Grammar, Oxford.

Teaching Methods

Presentation and class discussions with examples
Exercises and practical assignments with question-answer style

Weekly Topics

This weekly planning is subject to change with advance notice.
Week Topic Readings / References
1 Introduction to syntax Čaušević (451p); Hengirmen (322p);
2 Subject and predicate in sentence Čaušević (452p); Hengirmen (322p)
3 Complementary Elements of the Sentence: Object Čaušević (456p); Hengirmen (330p);
4 Complementary Elements of Sentence: Place Complement, Adverb Complement Čaušević (460p); Hengirmen (333p);
5 Quizz 1; Sentences by Structure: Simple, Compound Sentence Čaušević (470p); Hengirmen (353p);
6 Sentences by Structure: Ordered, Connected Sentences Čaušević (474p); Hengirmen (350p);
7 Sentences by Type of Predicate: Verb Sentence Čaušević (452p); Hengirmen (363p);
8 MID-TERM EXAM;
9 Sentences by Type of Predicate: Noun Phrase Čaušević (453p); Hengirmen (363p);
10 Sentences by Predicate Čaušević (466p); Hengirmen (346p);
11 Sentences by Meaning Ćaušević (473p); Hengirmen (350p);
12 Sentences by Meaning: Positive and Negative Čaušević (473p); Hengirmen (352p);
13 Sentences by Meaning: Question and Command Čaušević (473p); Hengirmen (350p);
14 Quiz 2; Sentence Analysis Čaušević; Hengirmen;
15 Speaking Exam;

Course Schedule (All Sections)

SectionTypeDay 1Venue 1Day 2Venue 2
TLT214.1 Course Monday 12:00 - 14:50 B F1.16 - -

Office Hours & Room

DayTimeOfficeNotes
Tuesday 12:00 - 14:00 B F1.15
Wednesday 13:00 - 15:00 B F1.15
Thursday 11:00 - 13:00 B F1.15

Assessment Methods and Criteria

Assessment Components

40%x1
Final Exam
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1  2  3  4  5

20%x1
Mid-term Exam
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1  2  3

10%x2
Quizzes
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1   2   3   4   5

30%x1
Speaking Exam
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1  2  3  4  5

IUS Grading System

Grading Scale IUS Grading System IUS Coeff. Letter (B&H) Numerical (B&H)
0 - 44 F 0 F 5
45 - 54 E 1
55 - 64 C 2 E 6
65 - 69 C+ 2.3 D 7
70 -74 B- 2.7
75 - 79 B 3 C 8
80 - 84 B+ 3.3
85 - 94 A- 3.7 B 9
95 - 100 A 4 A 10

IUS Grading System

Letter marks that do not affect student's CGPA:
  • "IP" – In progress is assigned for recording unfulfilled student obligations related to graduation project/thesis/dissertation and internship.
  • "S" – Satisfactory is assigned to a student who passed the examinations that are not numerically graded or whose written assignment has been accepted.
  • "U" – Unsatisfactory is assigned to a student who failed to pass the examinations that are not numerically graded.
  • "W" – Withdrawal signifies that student has withdrawn from the relevant course.
Additional letter mark that affects student's CGPA:

"N/A" – Not attending, and it is assigned to a student who is suspended from the course or who does not meet the minimal requirement for attendance on lectures or tutorials. The course lecturer must follow the attendance policy and assign "N/A" in each case of a student failing attendance.

Late Work Policy

Information about late submission policies will be shared during class and posted in this section. Please check back for official guidelines.

ECTS Credit Calculation

📚 Student Workload

This 6 ECTS credit course corresponds to 150 hours of total student workload, distributed as follows:

Lecture Hours

45 hours ⏳ (15 week × 3 h)

Active Tutorials

45 hours ⏳ (15 week × 3 h)

Mid-term Exam study

10 hours ⏳ (1 week × 10 h)

Final Exam study

20 hours ⏳ (1 week × 20 h)

Home study

30 hours ⏳ (15 week × 2 h)

150 Total Workload Hours

6 ECTS Credits


Course Policies

Academic Integrity

All work submitted must be your own. Plagiarism, cheating, or any form of academic dishonesty will result in disciplinary action according to university policies. When in doubt about citation practices, consult the instructor.

Attendance Policy

Students are expected to adhere to the attendance requirements as outlined in the International University of Sarajevo Study Rules and Regulations. Excessive absences, whether excused or unexcused, may impact academic performance and eligibility for assessment. Mandatory sessions (e.g., labs, workshops) require attendance unless formally exempted. For detailed policies on absences, documentation, and penalties, please refer to the official university regulations.

Technology & AI Policy

Laptops/tablets may be used for note-taking only during lectures. Phones should be silenced and put away during all class sessions. Audio/video recording requires prior permission from the instructor.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Usage: The use of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini) varies by assessment component. Please refer to the AI usage indicator next to each assessment item in the Assessment Methods and Criteria section above. Submitting AI-generated content as your own work, where AI is not explicitly allowed, constitutes an academic integrity violation.

Communication Policy

All course-related communication should occur through official university channels (institutional email or SIS). Emails should include [TLT214] in the subject line.

Academic Quality Assurance Policy

Course Academic Quality Assurance is achieved through Semester Student Survey. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.

More info

Article 112: Evaluation of Work of the Academic Staff

  1. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.
  2. Evaluation of work of each academic staff member is to be carried out in accordance with the Statute of the institution of higher education by the institution as well as by students.
  3. The institutions of higher education are obliged to carry out a students’ evaluation survey on the academic staff performance after the end of each semester, or after the completed teaching cycle for the subject taught.
  4. Evaluation must evaluate: lecture quality, student-academic staff interaction, correctness of communication, teacher’s attitudes towards students attending the teaching activities and at assessments, availability of suggested reading material, attendance and punctuality of the teacher, along with other criteria which are defined in the Statute.
  5. The institution of higher education by a specific act determines the procedure for evaluation of the academic staff performance, the content of survey forms, the manner of conducting the evaluation, grading criteria for the evaluation, as well as adequate measures for the academic staff who received negative evaluation for two consecutive years.
  6. The evaluation of the academic staff performance is an integral process of establishment the quality assurance system, or self-control and internal quality assurance.
  7. Results of the evaluation of the academic staff performance are to be adequately analyzed by the institution of higher education, and the decision of the head of the organizational unit about the employee’s work performance is an integral part of the personal file of each member of academic staff.

Learning Tips

Engage Actively

Be prepared to contribute thoughtfully during class discussions, labs, or collaborative work. Active participation deepens understanding and encourages critical thinking.

Read and Review Purposefully

Complete assigned readings or prep materials before class. Take notes, highlight key ideas, and jot down questions. Aim to grasp core concepts and their applications—not just facts.

Think Critically in Assignments

Use course frameworks or methodologies to analyze problems, case studies, or projects. Begin early to allow time for reflection and refinement. Seek feedback to improve your work.

Ask Questions Early

Don’t hesitate to reach out when something is unclear. Use office hours, discussion boards, or peer networks to clarify concepts and stay on track.

Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey

Syllabus Last Updated on Feb 02, 2026 | International University of Sarajevo

Print Syllabus  

 

 

Referencing Curricula Print this page

Course Code Course Title Weekly Hours* ECTS Weekly Class Schedule
T P
TLT214 Turkish Language IV (Turkish Sentence Knowledge) 1 2 6 Monday 12:00 - 14:50
Prerequisite None It is a prerequisite to -
Lecturer Dženana Bračković Office Hours / Room / Phone
Tuesday:
12:00-14:00
Wednesday:
13:00-15:00
Thursday:
11:00-13:00
B F1.15 - 033 957 425
E-mail dzbrackovic@ius.edu.ba
Assistant Assistant E-mail
Course Objectives In this course, students will learn how to evaluate Turkish syntax in practice, to analyze the syntax fragments in Turkish literary works as a whole (subject, auxiliary and predicate) and by dividing them into parts (nouns, phrases). In the second part of the course, students will learn types of sentences and analyze them through different texts.
Textbook Čaušević, E. (1996). Gramatika suvremenoga turskog jezika, Zagreb, Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada. Hemgirmen, M. (2006). Türkçe Temel Dilbilgisi, Ankara, Engin.
Additional Literature
  • Korkmaz, Z. (2009). Türkiye Türkçesi Grameri (Şekil Bilgisi), Ankara, TDK
  • Ergin, M. (1993). Türk Dil Bilgisi, İstanbul, Bayrak Yayınevi.
  • Lewis, G. (2001). Turkish Grammar, Oxford.
Learning Outcomes After successful  completion of the course, the student will be able to:
    Teaching Methods Presentation and class discussions with examples. Exercises and practical assignments with question-answer style.
    Teaching Method Delivery Face-to-face Teaching Method Delivery Notes
    WEEK TOPIC REFERENCE
    Week 1 Introduction to syntax Čaušević (451p); Hengirmen (322p);
    Week 2 Subject and predicate in sentence Čaušević (452p); Hengirmen (322p)
    Week 3 Complementary Elements of the Sentence: Object Čaušević (456p); Hengirmen (330p);
    Week 4 Complementary Elements of Sentence: Place Complement, Adverb Complement Čaušević (460p); Hengirmen (333p);
    Week 5 Quizz 1; Sentences by Structure: Simple, Compound Sentence Čaušević (470p); Hengirmen (353p);
    Week 6 Sentences by Structure: Ordered, Connected Sentences Čaušević (474p); Hengirmen (350p);
    Week 7 Sentences by Type of Predicate: Verb Sentence Čaušević (452p); Hengirmen (363p);
    Week 8 MID-TERM EXAM;
    Week 9 Sentences by Type of Predicate: Noun Phrase Čaušević (453p); Hengirmen (363p);
    Week 10 Sentences by Predicate Čaušević (466p); Hengirmen (346p);
    Week 11 Sentences by Meaning Ćaušević (473p); Hengirmen (350p);
    Week 12 Sentences by Meaning: Positive and Negative Čaušević (473p); Hengirmen (352p);
    Week 13 Sentences by Meaning: Question and Command Čaušević (473p); Hengirmen (350p);
    Week 14 Quiz 2; Sentence Analysis Čaušević; Hengirmen;
    Week 15 Speaking Exam;
    Assessment Methods and Criteria Evaluation Tool Quantity Weight Alignment with LOs AI Usage
    Final Exam 1 40 1,2,3,4,5 Not Allowed
    Semester Evaluation Components
    Mid-term Exam 1 20 1,2,3 Not Allowed
    Quizzes 2 10 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Not Allowed
    Speaking Exam 1 30 1,2,3,4,5, Not Allowed
    ***     ECTS Credit Calculation     ***
     Activity Hours Weeks Student Workload Hours Activity Hours Weeks Student Workload Hours
    Lecture Hours 3 15 45 Active Tutorials 3 15 45
    Mid-term Exam study 10 1 10 Final Exam study 20 1 20
    Home study 2 15 30
            Total Workload Hours = 150
    *T= Teaching, P= Practice ECTS Credit = 6
    Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey Last Update Date: 23/02/2026

    Print this page