Course Summary Course Objectives Learning Outcomes Course Materials Teaching Methods Weekly Topics Course Schedule Office Hours Assestment ECTS Calculation Course Policies Learning Tips Print Syllabi Download as PNG

MAN201 Introduction to Management Science

Syllabus   |  International University of Sarajevo  -  Last Update on Mar 03, 2026

Referencing Curricula

Syllabus Quick Jump

Search and navigate to any syllabus instantly

HOSTED BY

Management

- - | 6 ECTS Credits | International University of Sarajevo

Academic Year
-
Semester
-
Course Code
MAN201
Weekly Hours
2 Teaching + 1 Practice
ECTS
6
Prerequisites
MAN102
Teaching Mode Delivery
Prerequisite For
-
Teaching Mode Delivery Notes
-
Cycle
I Cycle
Prof. Jane Doe

TBA

Course Lecturer

Position
-
Email
-
Phone
033 957
Assistant(s)
-
Assistant E-mail
-

Course Objectives

The aim of this course is to introduce and teach students about mathematical model construction, spreadsheet modeling using Excel Solver, and interpretation of Solver output. The students will also learn about other decision making tools such as decision trees and simulation.

Learning Outcomes

After successful completion of the course, the student will be able to:

1
Identify and apply appropriate quantitative tools for managerial decision-making in business contexts
2
Explain the fundamental building blocks of quantitative decision-making models
3
Develop, solve, and interpret quantitative models using spreadsheet tools (e.g., Excel Solver).
4
Analyze and evaluate alternative solutions, including sensitivity to changes in model parameters.
5
Communicate findings effectively through professional written reports and oral presentations.

Course Materials

Required Textbook

Render, B., Stair R. M., and Balakrishnan, N. (2003). Managerial Decision Modeling with Spreadsheets, Prentice Hall.

Additional Literature

Teaching Methods

The methods include lectures (which may involve power point presentation
Video and audio aids)
Student presentations
Projects and class discussions.

Weekly Topics

This weekly planning is subject to change with advance notice.
Week Topic Readings / References
1 Introduction to Management Science & Modelling Chapter 1
2 Modelling, cont. Chapter 1
3 Linear Programming (LP): Graphical Solution Methods Chapter 2
4 Linear Programming (LP): Computer Solution Chapter 2
5 Using Excel Solver to solve LP problems / Interim Exam 1 Chapter 2
6 LP Applications Chapter 3
7 LP Applications cont. / Interim Exam 2 Chapter 3
8 LP Sensitivity Analysis Chapter 4
9 Mathematical Programming Models Chapter 6
10 IP, NLP, Goal Programming Models Chapter 6
11 Network models Chapter 5
12 Project Management Chapter 7
13 Simulation Chapter 10
14 Simulation cont. Chapter 10
15 Review / Lab Exam

Course Schedule (All Sections)

Course Schedules with all sections will be available here soon.

Office Hours & Room

Course Office hours will be available here soon.

Assessment Methods and Criteria

Assessment Components

25%x1
Final Exam
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1  2  3  4  5  6

30%x2
Interim Exams
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1  2  3  4  5  6

15%x1
Term Project
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1  2  3  4  5  6

15%x1
Lab Exam
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1  2  3  4  5  6

15%x4
Homework
AI: Not Allowed

Alignment with Learning Outcomes :  1  2  3  4  5  6

IUS Grading System

Grading Scale IUS Grading System IUS Coeff. Letter (B&H) Numerical (B&H)
0 - 44 F 0 F 5
45 - 54 E 1
55 - 64 C 2 E 6
65 - 69 C+ 2.3 D 7
70 -74 B- 2.7
75 - 79 B 3 C 8
80 - 84 B+ 3.3
85 - 94 A- 3.7 B 9
95 - 100 A 4 A 10

IUS Grading System

Letter marks that do not affect student's CGPA:
  • "IP" – In progress is assigned for recording unfulfilled student obligations related to graduation project/thesis/dissertation and internship.
  • "S" – Satisfactory is assigned to a student who passed the examinations that are not numerically graded or whose written assignment has been accepted.
  • "U" – Unsatisfactory is assigned to a student who failed to pass the examinations that are not numerically graded.
  • "W" – Withdrawal signifies that student has withdrawn from the relevant course.
Additional letter mark that affects student's CGPA:

"N/A" – Not attending, and it is assigned to a student who is suspended from the course or who does not meet the minimal requirement for attendance on lectures or tutorials. The course lecturer must follow the attendance policy and assign "N/A" in each case of a student failing attendance.

Late Work Policy

Information about late submission policies will be shared during class and posted in this section. Please check back for official guidelines.

ECTS Credit Calculation

📚 Student Workload

This 6 ECTS credit course corresponds to 150 hours of total student workload, distributed as follows:

Lecture Hours

45 hours ⏳ (15 week × 3 h)

Homework

12 hours ⏳ (4 week × 3 h)

Lab Exam

11 hours ⏳ (1 week × 11 h)

Active Tutorials

28 hours ⏳ (14 week × 2 h)

Term Project

10 hours ⏳ (1 week × 10 h)

Interim Exams Study

24 hours ⏳ (2 week × 12 h)

Final Exam Study

20 hours ⏳ (1 week × 20 h)

150 Total Workload Hours

6 ECTS Credits


Course Policies

Academic Integrity

All work submitted must be your own. Plagiarism, cheating, or any form of academic dishonesty will result in disciplinary action according to university policies. When in doubt about citation practices, consult the instructor.

Attendance Policy

Students are expected to adhere to the attendance requirements as outlined in the International University of Sarajevo Study Rules and Regulations. Excessive absences, whether excused or unexcused, may impact academic performance and eligibility for assessment. Mandatory sessions (e.g., labs, workshops) require attendance unless formally exempted. For detailed policies on absences, documentation, and penalties, please refer to the official university regulations.

Technology & AI Policy

Laptops/tablets may be used for note-taking only during lectures. Phones should be silenced and put away during all class sessions. Audio/video recording requires prior permission from the instructor.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Usage: The use of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini) varies by assessment component. Please refer to the AI usage indicator next to each assessment item in the Assessment Methods and Criteria section above. Submitting AI-generated content as your own work, where AI is not explicitly allowed, constitutes an academic integrity violation.

Communication Policy

All course-related communication should occur through official university channels (institutional email or SIS). Emails should include [MAN201] in the subject line.

Academic Quality Assurance Policy

Course Academic Quality Assurance is achieved through Semester Student Survey. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.

More info

Article 112: Evaluation of Work of the Academic Staff

  1. At the end of each academic year, the institution of higher education is obliged to evaluate work of the academic staff, or the success of realization of the curricula.
  2. Evaluation of work of each academic staff member is to be carried out in accordance with the Statute of the institution of higher education by the institution as well as by students.
  3. The institutions of higher education are obliged to carry out a students’ evaluation survey on the academic staff performance after the end of each semester, or after the completed teaching cycle for the subject taught.
  4. Evaluation must evaluate: lecture quality, student-academic staff interaction, correctness of communication, teacher’s attitudes towards students attending the teaching activities and at assessments, availability of suggested reading material, attendance and punctuality of the teacher, along with other criteria which are defined in the Statute.
  5. The institution of higher education by a specific act determines the procedure for evaluation of the academic staff performance, the content of survey forms, the manner of conducting the evaluation, grading criteria for the evaluation, as well as adequate measures for the academic staff who received negative evaluation for two consecutive years.
  6. The evaluation of the academic staff performance is an integral process of establishment the quality assurance system, or self-control and internal quality assurance.
  7. Results of the evaluation of the academic staff performance are to be adequately analyzed by the institution of higher education, and the decision of the head of the organizational unit about the employee’s work performance is an integral part of the personal file of each member of academic staff.

Learning Tips

Engage Actively

Be prepared to contribute thoughtfully during class discussions, labs, or collaborative work. Active participation deepens understanding and encourages critical thinking.

Read and Review Purposefully

Complete assigned readings or prep materials before class. Take notes, highlight key ideas, and jot down questions. Aim to grasp core concepts and their applications—not just facts.

Think Critically in Assignments

Use course frameworks or methodologies to analyze problems, case studies, or projects. Begin early to allow time for reflection and refinement. Seek feedback to improve your work.

Ask Questions Early

Don’t hesitate to reach out when something is unclear. Use office hours, discussion boards, or peer networks to clarify concepts and stay on track.

Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey

Syllabus Last Updated on Mar 03, 2026 | International University of Sarajevo

Print Syllabus  

 

 

Referencing Curricula Print this page

Course Code Course Title Weekly Hours* ECTS Weekly Class Schedule
T P
MAN201 Introduction to Management Science 2 1 6 Tuesday 11:00-12:50 Thursday 10:00-10:50
Prerequisite MAN102 It is a prerequisite to -
Lecturer Office Hours / Room / Phone

Currently not available

E-mail
Assistant Assistant E-mail
Course Objectives The aim of this course is to introduce and teach students about mathematical model construction, spreadsheet modeling using Excel Solver, and interpretation of Solver output. The students will also learn about other decision making tools such as decision trees and simulation.
Textbook Render, B., Stair R. M., and Balakrishnan, N. (2003). Managerial Decision Modeling with Spreadsheets, Prentice Hall.
Additional Literature
Learning Outcomes After successful  completion of the course, the student will be able to:
  1. Identify and apply appropriate quantitative tools for managerial decision-making in business contexts
  2. Explain the fundamental building blocks of quantitative decision-making models
  3. Develop, solve, and interpret quantitative models using spreadsheet tools (e.g., Excel Solver).
  4. Analyze and evaluate alternative solutions, including sensitivity to changes in model parameters.
  5. Communicate findings effectively through professional written reports and oral presentations.
Teaching Methods The methods include lectures (which may involve power point presentation, video and audio aids), student presentations, projects and class discussions.
Teaching Method Delivery Teaching Method Delivery Notes
WEEK TOPIC REFERENCE
Week 1 Introduction to Management Science & Modelling Chapter 1
Week 2 Modelling, cont. Chapter 1
Week 3 Linear Programming (LP): Graphical Solution Methods Chapter 2
Week 4 Linear Programming (LP): Computer Solution Chapter 2
Week 5 Using Excel Solver to solve LP problems / Interim Exam 1 Chapter 2
Week 6 LP Applications Chapter 3
Week 7 LP Applications cont. / Interim Exam 2 Chapter 3
Week 8 LP Sensitivity Analysis Chapter 4
Week 9 Mathematical Programming Models Chapter 6
Week 10 IP, NLP, Goal Programming Models Chapter 6
Week 11 Network models Chapter 5
Week 12 Project Management Chapter 7
Week 13 Simulation Chapter 10
Week 14 Simulation cont. Chapter 10
Week 15 Review / Lab Exam
Assessment Methods and Criteria Evaluation Tool Quantity Weight Alignment with LOs AI Usage
Final Exam 1 25 1,2,3,4,5,6 Not Allowed
Semester Evaluation Components
Interim Exams 2 30 1,2,3,4,5,6 Not Allowed
Term Project 1 15 1,2,3,4,5,6 Not Allowed
Lab Exam 1 15 1,2,3,4,5,6 Not Allowed
Homework 4 15 1,2,3,4,5,6 Not Allowed
***     ECTS Credit Calculation     ***
 Activity Hours Weeks Student Workload Hours Activity Hours Weeks Student Workload Hours
Lecture Hours 3 15 45 Homework 3 4 12
Lab Exam 11 1 11 Active Tutorials 2 14 28
Term Project 10 1 10 Interim Exams Study 12 2 24
Final Exam Study 20 1 20
        Total Workload Hours = 150
*T= Teaching, P= Practice ECTS Credit = 6
Course Academic Quality Assurance: Semester Student Survey Last Update Date: 27/03/2026

Print this page